From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Nov 26 06:15:02 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:15:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Eg0pS-0002Ln-BU for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:15:02 -0800 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.203]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Eg0pR-0002LW-AC for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:15:02 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t11so1813950wxc for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:14:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=buHRZAP4c3UtvcQ37iXXfeFh5gnF47Ftamc7bMTusacVUEiKk8iwtsCCEi0tb+EHDMEPfOT5gW+KcqyF0SfzAfSCBu3hZDo4gDq1LRhhFL5bSGu28KVUG8junJ298EZCMM6rnNgrBTNGogp1NW31U+XaR0JDNW91uYsUock9//A= Received: by 10.65.11.13 with SMTP id o13mr577066qbi; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:14:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.72.15 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:14:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2d3df92a0511260614j3b181ca4i5af1b8a45358134@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:14:59 +0100 From: HeliodoR To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Schwa. In-Reply-To: <4386EC5A.5090705@bilkent.edu.tr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_36026_23517556.1133014499190" References: <20051114112350.48230.qmail@web51506.mail.yahoo.com> <20051114151923.GA575@beverly.caldwell.out> <2d3df92a0511160541l8ce4d74y26c8edc556319ac3@mail.gmail.com> <4386EC5A.5090705@bilkent.edu.tr> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-archive-position: 2684 X-Approved-By: exitconsole@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners ------=_Part_36026_23517556.1133014499190 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline > > That's a matter of opinion - many linguists would say that English has > only two tenses: present and past. The rest is done with modal verbs > (e.g. "will") and aspect (e.g. perfective). If you look at English > "tenses" as combinations of tense and aspect, the Lojban way of doing > things seems a little less strange. Yes. And much more systematic. Thanks for this info, anyway. I've heard that every (*every*!) language has past tense. Which is a bit surprising if You think of that not all of them break up to words. (Some really weird langs consist of elements that sign almost whole sentences.) mi'e darves. ------=_Part_36026_23517556.1133014499190 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
That's a matter of opinion - man= y linguists would say that English has
only two tenses: present and past= . The rest is done with modal verbs
(e.g. "will") and aspect (e.g. perfective). If you look at En= glish
"tenses" as combinations of tense and aspect, the Lojban= way of doing
things seems a little less strange.
 
Yes. And much more systematic.
Thanks for this info, anyway.
I've heard that every (*every*!) language has past tense. Which is a b= it
surprising if You think of that not all of them break u= p to words. (Some
really weird langs consist of elements that sign almost whole sentence= s.)
 
mi'e darves.
------=_Part_36026_23517556.1133014499190--