From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Dec 01 08:07:36 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:07:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Ehqy8-0001zR-3y for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:07:36 -0800 Received: from dionysos.oderland.com ([213.115.211.26]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.54) id 1Ehqy5-0001zH-2F for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:07:35 -0800 Received: from c-e290e255.1210-16-64736c14.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se ([85.226.144.226]) by dionysos.oderland.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1EhqvQ-0007T8-94 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:04:48 +0100 Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: questions about questions From: Sunnan To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20051201153308.GG2289@miranda.org> References: <26506d300511280238g762086b4o@mail.gmail.com> <2d3df92a0511280645i24310fd2ga93e5b9be94cc067@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560511281547y25fe8c93hcc71e1220ad4c82f@mail.gmail.com> <26506d300511290026x3e37568cm@mail.gmail.com> <2d3df92a0511290946w6c3c4caaqfad9f1773be4b98b@mail.gmail.com> <20051129175651.GD2289@miranda.org> <2d3df92a0512010619p2ca628aepe86f3be1eaff71e5@mail.gmail.com> <20051201153308.GG2289@miranda.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:06:27 +0100 Message-Id: <1133453187.21995.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dionysos.oderland.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lojban.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - handgranat.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 2721 X-Approved-By: sunnan@handgranat.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: sunnan@handgranat.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 08:33 -0700, jkominek@miranda.org wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:19:17PM +0100, HeliodoR wrote: > > > No, they don't. There are rather a lot of important cmavo which are sumti. > > > > > > mi, do, ko'a, ko'i, ma, & da all come to mind immediately. > > > > Uhh... Yeah. But those are pro-sumti. So the moral is that EVERY > > (sumti AND NOT pro-sumti) INVOLVE selbri. Okay now? > > No. pro-sumti are a subset of sumti. Not some unrelated set. Thus, not > all sumti involve selbri. > While I'm confused about darves position that sumti involve selbri (where did that come from?) I'd like to point out that you can AND NOT with full subsets. I.e. if all fish are wet, you can still talk about things that are wet AND NOT fish. (Most non-logicians would use "but not" in those cases, though.)