From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Dec 13 16:31:20 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:31:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EmKYC-0003bU-5K for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:31:20 -0800 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EmKYB-0003bN-Sg for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:31:20 -0800 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:31:19 -0800 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: "Once More" Message-ID: <20051214003119.GR3329@chain.digitalkingdom.org> References: <12d58c160512120619v1ed1cdcp49af8ae1b4f3f86a@mail.gmail.com> <20051214000923.GK3329@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <925d17560512131624k30dede60n6f071da4292eeeeb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <925d17560512131624k30dede60n6f071da4292eeeeb@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 2754 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 09:24:26PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > On 12/13/05, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:19:33AM -0500, Adam COOPER wrote: > > > {za'u re'u} works. {do za'u re'u kargau lo vorme} > > > > > > There was a discussion at LogFest yesterday about how there's > > > not a good way to say "next time" as in "The next time you > > > open the door, make sure the ferret doesn't get out." > > > > More specifically, that there's no pure-tense way to do it. > > What about: > > ca lo nu do ba za'u re'u kargau lo vorme kei ko jundi lo nu > le mabrnfuru na barkla > "When you will open the door again, make sure the ferret > doesn't get out." That's "again", not "next time". Works in this case, I suppose, but not with a command that is only intended to cover the very next time, and that time only. "The next time you come in the house, be careful because we had the floors done today, and they might be slippery". -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/