From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Dec 21 18:26:26 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:26:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EpG9x-0003Xo-SV for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:26:26 -0800 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.192]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EpG9v-0003Xc-9s for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:26:25 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so265392wri for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:26:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UOsx/vXp5yNRRGV2gcnt02OjsxvNSMfXEFKW3hULmJaVD/aroNqK01mmtLx14Zk8wPUc6VyvYp8KKwjbxKwML8D8stFj9usyQ/+8fL3paY6JmUS4DjkBebTOVcseqj1MUktp5MvpFs9TBjHdWO58ls+OnRybBmmCWLpkoGA7y7w= Received: by 10.54.71.11 with SMTP id t11mr1632626wra; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:26:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.68.7 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:26:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560512211826w6d9a4c40ya59e356f1f961db9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:26:21 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Latent In-Reply-To: <002301c6064c$fad0b1e0$a0d2400a@caroe1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <002301c6064c$fad0b1e0$a0d2400a@caroe1> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 2841 X-Approved-By: jjllambias@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 12/21/05, Betsemes wrote: > : present and capable of becoming though not now visible, obvious, or active > > > I have failed to find a gismu for that word and finding a suitable > combination to make a lujvo. Any ideas? {nu'o} is not a gismu, but it is a related concept. {sipna} or {cando} could perhaps be used in a more or less metaphorical sense for latent, depending on what you want to apply it to. mu'o mi'e xorxes