From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Jan 23 04:51:17 2006
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 04:51:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1F11AB-0008Ip-P5
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 04:51:16 -0800
Received: from web51506.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.38.198])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <opi_lauma@yahoo.com>)
	id 1F11A5-0008Ib-85
	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 04:51:13 -0800
Received: (qmail 95253 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Jan 2006 12:48:32 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=YXCtZ4Q9vY7JrE0imUrDfUGw3mF6aa3FAYe5wDXN7f0x4QLYQYCgDIazt/LwFgvNcI89nRlvj8+wENLbMKG0Jm+HyCzRppugXCsEG4PBjmE61hhRfvAUE7RAELiJbzWCrBOhZiYCSnxwS6nJi7Ewh3yNKoTq6Lp2+AwrjCiip9c=  ;
Message-ID: <20060123124830.95245.qmail@web51506.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [141.2.216.130] by web51506.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 04:48:30 PST
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 04:48:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Opi Lauma <opi_lauma@yahoo.com>
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: pamoi le'i dotco prenu poi ...
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <4c4e58c10601230419u6a336a70sfb0642dc02f09441@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
X-archive-position: 2993
X-Approved-By: opi_lauma@yahoo.com
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: opi_lauma@yahoo.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-beginners



--- Evgeny Sklyanin <eks2005@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 1/23/06, Opi Lauma <opi_lauma@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Actually, I don't see other possible parsing of
> the
> > > phrase. The structure of
> > > the phrase is exactly the same as for, say,
> > > do viska le xirma poi mi nelci = You see the
> horse
> > > which I like.
> >
> > Right.
> > {do viska le xirma poi mi nelci} = "You see the
> horse
> > which I like."
> > Or the same (by meaning):
> > The horse which you see and the horse which I like
> is
> > the same object
> 
> 
> I disagree. To me, {le xirma poi mi nelci} is the
> single sumti , which is
> the argument x2 of {viska} . It restricts the
> description to only those
> horses which I like. And only those horses are  the
> argument x2 of {viska} ,
> that is the horses you see.

But your understanding does not disagree with my (in
this case).
{le xirma poi mi nelci} – is “the horse which I like”
and you see this horse {do viska le xirma poi...}.

The same {prenu poi mi penmi} is person that I met.
And this person is the first german person {pamoi le'i
dotco prenu poi ...}. But it is not clear in which
sens he is “the first".

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com