From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jan 24 07:17:18 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:55:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F1Pv4-0005ar-7r for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 07:17:18 -0800 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.203]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F1Pv1-0005aj-J5 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 07:17:17 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z3so1141150nzf for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 07:17:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:references:subject:date:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=oyIySfhTwID4SN+tUEPQ4TNG06LJoPCjosRvqXKVQOm543Bs0Ilfj4Zb3sYLwquJiR3ZFuKXEfiEmthzjD3fIhONNokCli6V8DDeIpMQ07GV0ywWoVqyxOZQomOC+xGSa2ZZIL5gqtGtOyRj8O8sWuOXRHBCxYAHTdkMmo+8jOs= Received: by 10.36.127.11 with SMTP id z11mr1337003nzc; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 07:17:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from caroe1 ( [65.218.132.157]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 24sm2984990nzn.2006.01.24.07.17.12; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 07:17:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <052a01c620f9$00b698b0$a0d2400a@caroe1> From: "Betsemes" To: References: <1283088462.20060124161953@mail.ru> <20060124114435.84797.qmail@web51509.mail.yahoo.com> <925d17560601240559i60c3e4f0m6807002d6728db72@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: pamoi le'i dotco prenu poi ... Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:15:19 -0400 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-archive-position: 3011 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: betsemes@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners > > You and xorxes have mentioned "rule of ordering". But > > with the construction like {lo ka mi penmi ce'u ca ma > > kau} you construct time of event (parameter which is > > used for ordering). So may be it is better to speak > > not about rule but about parameter which is used for > > ordering? If it is the case, I do not understand why I > > cannot use {lo tcika be lo nu mi penmi ra} as the > > ordering parameter. > > I wouldn't go as far as to say you cannot use it. All I say > is that {lo tcika be lo nu mi penmi ra} refers to a time, and > {lo ka mi penmi ce'u ca ma kau} refers to a mapping > from people to the time they are met by me. I don't know > how much is worth bothering making this distinction. I don't know you, but me, if I see a clock time in the place of an ordering rule, then I would think of the clock time as *the ordering rule*.