From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Jan 26 10:19:06 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:19:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F2Bi6-0005ek-G6 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:19:06 -0800 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F2Bi6-0005ed-6d for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:19:06 -0800 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:19:06 -0800 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Three-side war Message-ID: <20060126181906.GQ11406@chain.digitalkingdom.org> References: <625103441.20060126215515@mail.ru> <20060126164849.GG11406@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <925d17560601260911n750920adlca92697451dafe93@mail.gmail.com> <20060126171426.GI11406@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <009701c622a2$32c1dd10$a0d2400a@caroe1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <009701c622a2$32c1dd10$a0d2400a@caroe1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 3026 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 01:59:02PM -0400, Betsemes wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 02:11:36PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > > On 1/26/06, Robin Lee Powell > > > wrote: > > > > If it was me, I'd do something like: > > > > > > > > lo remna .e la protos .e la zerg cu simxu lo nu jamna > > > > > > That's {lo remna cu simxu lo nu jamna .ije la protos cu simxu > > > lo nu jamna .ije la zerg cu simxu lo nu jamna}, i.e. humans at > > > war with humans, Protoss with Protoss and Zerg with Zerg. > > > > > > To make it humans, Protoss and Zerg against each other you > > > need to make it nondistributive, with {joi} or {jo'u} instead > > > of {.e}. > > > > Right, of course. Sorry. > > Would {lo jamna se simxu be lo remna jo'u la protos jo'u la zerg} > work? Yeah, I think that works. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/