From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Feb 05 17:40:10 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:40:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F5vMQ-0007wA-Ac for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:40:10 -0800 Received: from ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com ([24.93.47.41] helo=ms-smtp-02-eri0.texas.rr.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F5vMM-0007w0-Qd for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:40:10 -0800 Received: from hypermetrics.com (cpe-66-68-164-156.austin.res.rr.com [66.68.164.156]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.texas.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id k161e3e1023212 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:40:03 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <43E6A8F3.4080004@hypermetrics.com> Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:40:03 -0600 From: Hal Fulton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031114 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Lojban parser and graph generator References: <55715.203.155.1.245.1138033715.squirrel@subvert-the-dominant-paradigm.net> <1139155325.11221.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1139155325.11221.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 3045 X-Approved-By: hal9000@hypermetrics.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: hal9000@hypermetrics.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners John Leuner wrote: > I have made some small updates to my lojban parser: > [snip] Pardon me for being dense. I love this idea, but I don't see the usefulness of the way it's implemented. When it creates a graph of nodes, they just have generic labels, with no clue what node goes with what node in the original sentence. Am I missing something? Hal