From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Apr 20 08:14:46 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 08:35:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FWarm-0004b5-Ey for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 08:14:46 -0700 Received: from web38508.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.125.54]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FWarl-0004ax-HI for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 08:14:46 -0700 Received: (qmail 68868 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Apr 2006 15:14:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4Jwn1lsR8c7g1FPYlhEFFkbWLhW26oqQ2svKT0BQLOhXSdCYrxGBy2GwOJFF2ur7xmsSjuOhExG3RYow7liZWaGiM7HBNT4GVu/qxEGig2AOPAmGGFMVetOMuU8YgSti8f2TJPS5XAtup+u4ebPaW5ssIp9UJ0n9FEPLp3pdl+E= ; Message-ID: <20060420151444.68866.qmail@web38508.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [128.111.97.78] by web38508.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 08:14:44 PDT Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 08:14:44 -0700 (PDT) From: c k Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Falling into x1 sumti? To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-317872761-1145546084=:67064" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-archive-position: 3153 X-Approved-By: jkominek@miranda.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: letsclimbhigher@yahoo.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners --0-317872761-1145546084=:67064 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit It seems that ko wouldn't take up the x1 sumti because you can have something like "ko mi nelci do", right? Which doesn't mean, ko=x1, mi=x2, do=x3 Also since in a bridi like "klama mi tu" mi=x1 and tu=x2, then wouldn't "le gurni" in the name way fall into the x1 sumti since no x1 was given? But then, "ko vi'i fe'e di'i se sombo le gurni" doesn't look right either, and I'm not sure why. c k wrote: Hi all, In the following bridi, why doens't "le gurni" fall into the x1 sumti spot? ko vi'i fe'e di'i sombo le gurni Thanks! --------------------------------- New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big. --0-317872761-1145546084=:67064 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
It seems that ko wouldn't take up the x1 sumti because you can have something like "ko mi nelci do", right?  Which doesn't mean, ko=x1, mi=x2, do=x3
 
Also since in a bridi like "klama mi tu" mi=x1 and tu=x2, then wouldn't "le gurni" in the name way fall into the x1 sumti since no x1 was given?
 
But then, "ko vi'i fe'e di'i se sombo le gurni" doesn't look right either, and I'm not sure why.

c k <letsclimbhigher@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi all,
 
In the following bridi, why doens't "le gurni" fall into the x1 sumti spot?
 
ko vi'i fe'e di'i sombo le gurni
 
Thanks!

New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big. --0-317872761-1145546084=:67064--