From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Apr 29 10:54:32 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:54:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FZteK-00013G-1w for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:54:32 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.233]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FZteG-000138-Fg for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:54:31 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so1894011wri for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:54:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l1sU2TjH4uJ2HOPkQA9pg6NekK7BN/pcu1iQqEc69nWmLbGuFyK+kKSkgk1qXPLJ7a3jlEYchegaychYe/PXdOEnMVCjetsDQ78N000V0GL7SFgfHAMqUwHWWcpHME7OyHsBKc22aDDMxrwF+kGUYnvPr1tPSaqgmxPixBR+2yk= Received: by 10.54.127.1 with SMTP id z1mr2423119wrc; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:54:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.126.18 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:54:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560604291054v59581f37geb826edb92a5d844@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:54:27 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: unneeded bevri? In-Reply-To: <20060429164158.66948.qmail@web38515.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060429164158.66948.qmail@web38515.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 3168 X-Approved-By: jjllambias@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 4/29/06, c k wrote: > > Notice the second "bevri" in example 17.12; Isn't it unnecessary as shown > in the first example? Not only unnecessary, it's ungrammatical to have it there. I have added it to the list of book errata: mu'o mi'e xorxes