From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu May 11 12:51:12 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 11 May 2006 12:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeHBo-0008Rl-Bb for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:51:12 -0700 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.229]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeHBm-0008Rd-Ho for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:51:12 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i32so221736wra for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:51:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VcfSg0PcGoVbyy6evHQux0r9An5yS599VE8xIjLu1UXvgMJOvmt8TU5dQmnp9/oR3i4xzZ+0U3xaTEMAiVAG8tIV0S1POc3U6CE1I7RAORtgO1acoR+eD38n3cmCfdB18ypqzP6c1Hu0pHfxVj+nfQrBlYSp/bTeSLiuHBC0o1A= Received: by 10.64.88.11 with SMTP id l11mr1805296qbb; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:51:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.249.4 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:51:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:51:07 -0400 From: "Matt Arnold" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: imperative {mi}? In-Reply-To: <20060510032054.GA26944@ginosko> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060510032054.GA26944@ginosko> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 3191 X-Approved-By: matt.mattarn@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners You are the intended listener in those statements, which makes you {do}. Therefore you can use {ko} to refer to yourself. After all, when you're telling yourself something you're also listening to yourself. -epkat On 5/9/06, Michael Hendricks wrote: > Is there an imperative form of {mi}? I looked through the cmavo list, > but didn't see anything besides {ko}. If there's no cmavo, what's a > good way to convey the same concept? I'm thinking of statements like > the entries in a todo list where I might write "wash the car" or "pay > the phone bill". I think of those statements being imperative to > myself. > > -- > Michael > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFEYVwW2SxmMIGsLdwRAvjoAJ9QddUA9uMSH/+N8kSsg8oHCVn+CACfSZys > 1EJL1GcQXYABrMAva9CGc8Y= > =ShKU > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >