From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri May 12 02:36:37 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 12 May 2006 02:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeU4V-0002fT-1H for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:36:32 -0700 Received: from mailgw6.gedas.de ([139.1.44.12]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeU49-0002fJ-6T for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:36:26 -0700 Received: from mailgw6.gedas.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw6.gedas.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4C9a6q4010089 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:36:06 +0200 Received: from blnsem08.de.gedas-grp (blnsem08.gedas.de [139.1.84.54]) by mailgw6.gedas.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4C9a59s010083 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:36:05 +0200 Received: by blnsem08.de.gedas-grp with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:36:05 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Newton, Philip" To: "'lojban-beginners@lojban.org'" Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: imperative {mi}? Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:36:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 3192 X-Approved-By: Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Agreed. Prefix it with {doi mi} if you like -- e.g. {doi mi ko lumci lo karce}. mu'o mi'e .filip. > -----Original Message----- > From: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org > [mailto:lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org] On Behalf Of Matt Arnold > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 9:51 PM > To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org > Subject: [SPAM Verdacht] - [lojban-beginners] Re: imperative > {mi}? - Bayesian Filter detected spam > > > You are the intended listener in those statements, which > makes you {do}. Therefore you can use {ko} to refer to > yourself. After all, when you're telling yourself something > you're also listening to yourself. -epkat > > On 5/9/06, Michael Hendricks wrote: > > Is there an imperative form of {mi}? I looked through the > cmavo list, > > but didn't see anything besides {ko}. If there's no cmavo, > what's a > > good way to convey the same concept? I'm thinking of > statements like > > the entries in a todo list where I might write "wash the > car" or "pay > > the phone bill". I think of those statements being imperative to > > myself. > > > > -- > > Michael > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > > > iD8DBQFEYVwW2SxmMIGsLdwRAvjoAJ9QddUA9uMSH/+N8kSsg8oHCVn+CACfSZys > > 1EJL1GcQXYABrMAva9CGc8Y= > > =ShKU > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > > > >