From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jul 05 08:13:36 2006
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 05 Jul 2006 08:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1Fy94K-0002a4-0C	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 08:13:36 -0700
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.183])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)	(envelope-from <jjllambias@gmail.com>)	id 1Fy94J-0002Zx-5n	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 08:13:35 -0700
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d42so2223280pyd        for <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 08:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;        s=beta; d=gmail.com;        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;        b=i26NN3atiFoW+7f1nWU5z7Q/Sm7WMeZIDTBTuaPSzbmY6iC+e0JA2Wnx7bIANEgMKJEP/Q8NCo6FFkrwBDrCcmINq2llB+mwSJ27cL6ITFAT8/px6Ti2m7RRSizbyXSG/hCBV7b2X4anuCn4iQohfdFJIA2N8f+HADXku4DVweY=
Received: by 10.35.82.15 with SMTP id j15mr5219180pyl;        Wed, 05 Jul 2006 08:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.35.14.17 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 08:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d17560607050813g5c38ea2cke2c128f0faf42f48@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:13:32 -0300
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: RK-like diagramming: Anyone interested?
In-Reply-To: <537d06d00607050755v7b2d995ex8ec5f0199554fbc2@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <44AAC810.2070300@hypermetrics.com>	 <44AADE4C.3080601@hypermetrics.com>	 <e202d93c0607041449q3f5cd640rc8f8637547e035ae@mail.gmail.com>	 <200607042148.25751.phma@phma.optus.nu>	 <e202d93c0607041940r3d12e33qd9befcc0913f5607@mail.gmail.com>	 <44AB5FB7.2010609@hypermetrics.com>	 <e202d93c0607050738g100e4ef6nafed55990646744a@mail.gmail.com>	 <537d06d00607050755v7b2d995ex8ec5f0199554fbc2@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 3340
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

On 7/5/06, Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/5/06, Jonathan Gibbons <jonored@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Although there is the example of
> >
> > >  "le nu broda ku brode" and "le nu broda kei brode" are grammatical,
> > >  but "le nu broda brode", eliding both terminators, is not.
> >
> > from the discussion, that leads me to ask; is a statement that
> > consists of just a sumti, with no selbri, grammatical or
> > ungrammatical?
...
> So I believe that {le nu broda brode} is grammatical; it's merely not
> equivalent to the other two example, since {broda brode} forms a tanru
> there.

Right. Notice that the other two are not equivalent either:

{(le nu broda ku) brode} is a full bridi.
{le (nu broda kei) brode} is just a sumti.

mu'o mi'e xorxes