From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Oct 12 19:46:53 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:46:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GYD4W-000805-UP for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:46:53 -0700 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GYD4U-0007zt-KD for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:46:52 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x30so787635nfb for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:46:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OHsEZW5v1wJ/ei+aQKIsnu/R9SvzqbEIU6r/DvizdkfGnlyewQ/Nj0WbBiFsNAagsPamx9HER0Qid01Kgu92NbSYmUzP+NMQ65IFQH1qzX/9K6YWwbqhtMWrKJ37JzbxO/obo4rICUhteE6A8aLfqHELU1T25oVZSAh92S/3AkY= Received: by 10.78.128.15 with SMTP id a15mr3077722hud; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.144.3 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:46:48 -0400 From: "Matt Arnold" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: problem In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <9ea0266d0610120211gd3e5557p8dd2970b19f39571@mail.gmail.com> <537d06d00610120242g714cea4et4d7dbb72a630109@mail.gmail.com> <2C91E382-A66F-464D-969E-C8E4365765A2@umich.edu> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 3628 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 10/12/06, Alex Martini wrote: > the former is probably a better pronunciation. I'm still not > convinced that there > should be a trill with the xy though. I will try stop by my > Linguistics prof's office > hours in the next few days and see if she can pronounce the different > sounds > h, x, and X for me. > > It occurs to me that this perhaps we should move off the beginners > list for a bit if > we have a lot of discussion to do, and then report back to it on the > results. > > mu'omi'e .aleks. Since this concerns a distinction that requires consulting a Linguistics professor, I agree that is a good sign the discussion should move off the beginner's list. :) -epkat