From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Dec 01 06:02:31 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 01 Dec 2006 06:02:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gq8y9-0001LO-Cl for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 06:02:25 -0800 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.239]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gq8xl-0001Es-AK for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 06:02:23 -0800 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so966757wra for ; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 06:02:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PSjspTnAZFEIfFACsD3CUBnL8yVakoh/je1phjpDQOwAW/SXpckbVbk0KFR9mlMpaNOS34peRa0MyPKXdTwoaIkPYuQUZTQvE5Fgz1MrcRub8VAwIL0oYoUhKCyJXa9/uh8t5yrjbgc8nvBqjc+RQypWaDZmnMiccnBIf6oucuc= Received: by 10.90.103.2 with SMTP id a2mr5040243agc.1164981718465; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 06:01:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.104.9 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:01:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:01:58 -0400 From: Betsemes To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: A learning idea..... and my own attempt to do it. In-Reply-To: <925d17560611301513k13ea795eq4bf36cad79b55a49@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <925d17560611301513k13ea795eq4bf36cad79b55a49@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 3733 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: betsemes@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 11/30/06, Jorge Llambías wrote: > On 11/30/06, Betsemes wrote: > > > zi lo jeftu be li re mi [pu] co'a pidversra lo mi bimoi be lo'i verba > > be'o ne lo se natmrfilipino ke cmalu. nixli poi xabju lo tcadu pe me'e > > la'o py. Manila .py. > > {la'o py. Manila .py} is the city, not the name of the city: > {lo tcadu po'u la'o py. Manila .py} > > {zoi py. Manila .py} would be the name. I prefer {lo tcadu po'u la'o py. Manila .py} > > So there is no type 4 fu'ivla for "Filipino". I think there should be > > one. > > {filpino} or {pilpino} would work. Nice. I prefer {pilpino}. I assume that this fu'ivla would take the same place structure as any cultural gismu suck as glico: glico x1 is English/pertains to English-speaking culture in aspect x2 so then: pilpino x1 is Pilipino/pertains to Pilipino-speaking culture in aspect x2 So then this would result on: zi lo jeftu be li re mi [pu] co'a pidversra lo mi bimoi be lo'i verba be'o ne lo pilpino ke cmalu. nixli poi xabju lo tcadu po'u la'o py. Manila .py Anything wrong?