From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Dec 29 08:24:00 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:24:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H0KWV-0004uA-AN for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:23:59 -0800 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H0KWP-0004tw-UE for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:23:58 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so9098306nfb for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:23:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VyOBoQFYSpC/Wo3OPQMA+CS7wJLQD7zgRE9mUPDwRFou/bJLSS+T/N7a9xdG+FCqVeLJNbKzRANtlNiNnpu6/Rm/8LBjpmSDj/ZZOEPgVlOrIK1mWX3Gqn7HeB5TGCNBCcPXDz8IXfj76hc4iPnQbmm3IJ6z/okOptHU98YqFp4= Received: by 10.82.152.16 with SMTP id z16mr708951bud.1167409432292; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:23:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.116.6 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:23:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560612290823na546509vcfecebae6adaec97@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:23:52 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: pu'i? In-Reply-To: <20061229111722.9j25wb7vyko8ksko@web.mail.umich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <0A4A8D28-8EBF-49B7-8CB8-5E3F225F0F09@mindspring.com> <20061229111722.9j25wb7vyko8ksko@web.mail.umich.edu> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-Spam-Score-Int: -24 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 3855 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 12/29/06, alexjm@umich.edu wrote: > > I can see som ambiguity if you have {pu'ibroda} -- can this break into > both {pu'i broda} and be an alternate for {pujbroda}? Or would we need > {pu'irbroda} for the second meaning? Yes, you need the {r}, precisely to avoid that ambiguity. Initial and unstressed CVV rafsi must always be glued with an -r- (or -n-, when -r- is not possible) . mu'o mi'e xorxes