From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Dec 29 08:24:23 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:24:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H0KWs-0004uk-Jd for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:24:22 -0800 Received: from express.cec.wustl.edu ([128.252.21.16]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H0KWn-0004uX-SN for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:24:22 -0800 Received: from hive.cec.wustl.edu (hive.cec.wustl.edu [128.252.21.14]) by express.cec.wustl.edu (8.13.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id kBTGOBr9000288 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:24:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from hive.cec.wustl.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hive.cec.wustl.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBTGMjpC021015; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:22:45 -0600 Received: from localhost (adam@localhost) by hive.cec.wustl.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id kBTGMj6m021012; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:22:45 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: hive.cec.wustl.edu: adam owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:22:45 -0600 (CST) From: "Adam D. Lopresto" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: pu'i? In-Reply-To: <20061229111722.9j25wb7vyko8ksko@web.mail.umich.edu> Message-ID: References: <0A4A8D28-8EBF-49B7-8CB8-5E3F225F0F09@mindspring.com> <20061229111722.9j25wb7vyko8ksko@web.mail.umich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: -25 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 3856 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: adam@pubcrawler.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, alexjm@umich.edu wrote: > I can see som ambiguity if you have {pu'ibroda} -- can this break into both > {pu'i broda} and be an alternate for {pujbroda}? Or would we need {pu'irbroda} > for the second meaning? If it can break apart, it will, so {pu'ibroda} is always {pu'i broda}, and you do need {pu'irbroda} for the lujvo. -- Adam Lopresto http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/ And entropy continued to increase.