From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Jan 28 07:51:19 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 28 Jan 2007 07:51:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HBCJK-0001nT-8m for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 07:51:18 -0800 Received: from phma.optus.nu ([166.82.175.165] helo=ixazon.dynip.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HBCJG-0001nF-Mn for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 07:51:17 -0800 Received: from chausie (unknown [192.168.7.4]) by ixazon.dynip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DBD8CE88C for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:51:01 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: rafsi problem with pro-bridi Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:46:44 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <492596e80701280103v6a1d0eb8ka0271c5d93e4521f@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560701280722v22c36075i320ee896424111a4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <925d17560701280722v22c36075i320ee896424111a4@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701281046.45171.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Spam-Score: -2.2 X-Spam-Score-Int: -21 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 3966 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Sunday 28 January 2007 10:22, Jorge Llambías wrote: > In practice though, these words don't seem to be used even as gismu, > so even the rafsi for broda and brode would be unnecessary. Those two I find useful in {rodbo'e}, one of several words for "thingamajig", "whatchamacallit", "doohickey": {daidza}, {comdaidza}, {dzabo'e}, etc. Pierre