From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Feb 26 09:00:59 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:00:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HLjDe-0003gq-Hr for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:00:58 -0800 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.173]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HLjDV-0003gJ-KN for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:00:58 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 32so845607ugm for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:00:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oU6itJol+QkOTCrP/+VA6oR+9Wf2L1IQYz3ZGWv++S6fZs3biyMRVkbQDBWVEllZ3/Ie3az+MYzrs4rffBjhuW7SBZ9yssSo6zIyoYDQW1CdMLzcEnTXi1nIK39sXwxp0mR/0RNHtLNcVpWwy3AguXeK447T1xLWi66u24yd+nQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uregorjQeN9iv1enE052c2BaTiAuimG6dR8IpsYzbiNjPWNa/Rp+HMinJafNpG0BHetmPS71nd9/CZmphb820hmdZPt69xFqRxj4Hg6C5Dh7ogBJJarnmNc07ldoTYsWjVcRuGzMcbOcInMxZyFw2gBIKg0jOpC/fMLZXwsMlJQ= Received: by 10.78.131.8 with SMTP id e8mr472391hud.1172509246116; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:00:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.50.10 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:00:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <23dc8c770702260900o7a0206bci74d66ce10d3c71e4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:00:46 +0000 From: "Karl Naylor" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Forbidden triples and doubled FAs (two topics) In-Reply-To: <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4031E7BD7@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4031E7BD3@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com> <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4031E7BD7@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 X-Spam-Score-Int: -20 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 4051 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: karl.org@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 26/02/07, Turniansky, Michael wrote: > 2) An utterance of the form "le broda cu le brode fe le brodi" or even "le > broda cu fe le brode fe le brodi" is grammatically acceptable, but does it > have any meaning? As I see it, there are three possibilities: One) it is I'm still confused about this one since apparently neither example has a selbri, although I'm perfectly happy with the effect of specifying two values for the same place. Was the lack of selbri a mistake, or does it use some grammar I'm not familiar with?