From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon May 21 01:11:59 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 21 May 2007 01:12:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hq2zl-0003Sf-II for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 01:11:58 -0700 Received: from mailgw6.gedas.de ([139.1.44.12]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hq2zb-0003SA-3c for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 01:11:56 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw6.gedas.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4L8BdCZ027507 for ; Mon, 21 May 2007 10:11:39 +0200 Received: from blnsem08.de.gedas-grp (blnsem08.gedas.de [139.1.84.54]) by mailgw6.gedas.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4L8BcH3027500 for ; Mon, 21 May 2007 10:11:38 +0200 Received: by blnsem08.de.gedas-grp with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 21 May 2007 10:11:37 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Newton, Philip" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: distinction between gismu & cmavo Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 10:11:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 4560 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners la .pier.abat. cu cusku di'e > No, a stage 4 fu'ivla may not have form CVCCV or CCVCV So something like {pitsa} or {salsa} is not a stage-4 fu'ivla but, if anything, an experimental gismu? What about {.iglu} - (experimental) gismu or fu'ivla? mu'o mi'e .filip.