From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon May 21 08:29:42 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 21 May 2007 08:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hq9pN-000566-KR for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 08:29:42 -0700 Received: from smtp1.isgenesis.com ([168.215.170.6] helo=isgenesis.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hq9pJ-00055y-J3 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 08:29:41 -0700 Received: from [208.124.51.223] (account ccd HELO [192.168.1.10]) by isgenesis.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.5) with ESMTPSA id 2561489 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 10:29:35 -0500 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=isgenesis.com; client-ip=208.124.51.223; envelope-from=cduffy@spamcop.net Message-ID: <4651BAD5.6000707@spamcop.net> Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 10:29:25 -0500 From: Charles Duffy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: GMANE (was Re: Re: a thing about your mail client that annoys me/us) References: <1179347676.464b6adccb26b@ssl0.ovh.net> <464B6BDC.8070105@perpetuum-immobile.de> <1179749253.46518b85898f0@ssl0.ovh.net> <46518ECB.8010006@spamcop.net> <20070521151831.GU7871@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20070521151831.GU7871@digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 3.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 30 X-Spam-Bar: +++ X-archive-position: 4578 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: cduffy@spamcop.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Robin Lee Powell wrote: > I (the list manager) don't see an appropriate place in the GMANE > hierarchy; did you have a suggestion? > I'd probably go for something like the following: gmane.science.linguistics.conlangs.lojban.beginners ...so long as the linguists don't get upset with folks poaching on their namespace. (I've mentioned Lojban to our NLG team lead at work. Her response was... rather hostile).