From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Jun 01 03:01:29 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hu3wm-0000pz-HY for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:01:29 -0700 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.241]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hu3wR-0000p4-FJ for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:01:28 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b21so172154ana for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:01:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EhcT9YwRufSOF4D7RQR7R/u+YKjc2AgjQknO7RwgrhEAWg9cY3v+u8JtJHLkMwE8kFdEZNvsvP9ajkXImc7JHbNe4Zvod/5YfzCpm/+DreSDo+8+UjSJvQnvtZZ/TzvVlvawgzZqdF/oPCKicRHgsHQdTQYsUJSaLyIKZxHJHUE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SpCLuNIQMoExtW/Wiidg8HIN79Ninh+qjzehYHWDtqrRg9io4G3VJ3QbpOlZQv4cV2DOVlM1l8jr/YRhXJowAWOSWRxE91nMDrUX4oItPpxmKrwpJY3JtP2eWSkoN5WvzXd2ILYg3/y9KlJja6i6NTq2zgFoYV9vPLYCGB7+QL4= Received: by 10.100.123.9 with SMTP id v9mr917058anc.1180692065778; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.92.6 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 03:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <23dc8c770706010301n673590e4pf3e2da4ddb620abf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:01:05 +0100 From: "Karl Naylor" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: la melpelkre .e le ci cribe In-Reply-To: <925d17560705311246q3de23d80vfdb4096f2540858d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <23dc8c770705311208n636478fcsac41783414294254@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560705311246q3de23d80vfdb4096f2540858d@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 4796 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: karl.org@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 31/05/07, Jorge Llambías wrote: > > .i ko'a citka piso'u lei mavdja pe le pamoi tansi noi barda .i .oi ra > > glare bancu > {dukse} is probably better than {bancu} in those. Actually, it occurs to me that if the English definition in the gimste is accurate, then {dukse} doesn't seem to work. {ra glare dukse} would mean "it [the porridge] is a hot-kind-of-excess", presumably an abbreviation of {ra dukse le ka glare}, "it is an excess of hotness". But porridge is not heat, so it can't be an excess of heat. What about {le ra glare cu dukse}? Or is the gimste definition simply misleading, and {ra glare dukse} is OK? mu'o