From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jun 19 13:36:32 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I0kRD-0003gC-QT for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:36:32 -0700 Received: from 25.mail-out.ovh.net ([213.186.37.103]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I0kRA-0003g5-Bb for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:36:31 -0700 Received: (qmail 30881 invoked by uid 503); 19 Jun 2007 20:36:47 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.0); 19 Jun 2007 20:36:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail87.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 25.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 19 Jun 2007 20:36:47 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 19 Jun 2007 20:36:06 -0000 Received: from 129.43-225-89.dsl.completel.net (129.43-225-89.dsl.completel.net [89.225.43.129]) by ssl0.ovh.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:36:06 +0200 Message-ID: <1182285366.46783e368dc09@ssl0.ovh.net> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:36:06 +0200 From: m.kornig@sondal.net To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Lojban names (cmene) References: <1182273256.46780ee88f18a@ssl0.ovh.net> <925d17560706191138l4e81cb41o36491fb0118be503@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <925d17560706191138l4e81cb41o36491fb0118be503@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6 X-Originating-IP: 89.225.43.129 X-Spam-Score: 0.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: 6 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 5064 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: m.kornig@sondal.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Selon Jorge Llambías : > There are a few parsers around (sorry I don't have any links) but they > probably don't all exactly agree on all points on what is valid and what is > invalid when it comes to all cmevla. There are still some minor points that > have not been fully sorted out (mainly concerning long consonant clusters > and long vowel clusters in cmevla and fu'ivla). What is a parser?? Martin