From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Dec 31 12:43:49 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:43:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J9RUC-0005bG-01 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:43:49 -0800 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J9RU3-0005ah-7c for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:43:47 -0800 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so2417510fga.0 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:43:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=OEW3Tc7RLi0OQj1jKob9vZz/JCqL+UtjxqWsr/n7s9k=; b=urrUXzwg8iCEEwAStJd28nSlqXbX+jfGJKPYfjx7x7Cnt2z00vioemTMB05AsHsiB/dXVkcrG+0A30JkF6qmnPMI/RLVluSoSYrUqFjIcf+WfsaJdm3zbMzs8cNSHpg6HnsrkFuABTeaxHoJ4d2tVcU+AV2iGeoBO8SvI2lKwTA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=M7iIlMn8Lxgb4QIo/c2U0dFys4TV8KeHRhnAM5yviXjc2GjXijG9dW8txseA1Yhp0CUrvC9u5IizPReApQ7eojHYauFALtKrTU7a7loBsRgky0hJtgWRtE80/xZgcWNVX3f81lmx2+TBBIIOUiuSFXtPjOSxztik+sQBmXdnlmI= Received: by 10.86.25.17 with SMTP id 17mr12602014fgy.28.1199133817036; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:43:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.27.19 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:43:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560712311243w7585a99ge10c5fd29141b2df@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:43:36 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: confusing gismus In-Reply-To: <477936E6.90709@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <2f91285f0712300908l379651c5o91cde87e8b81960e@mail.gmail.com> <20071230110938.lvwyvup5kwsc04g4@webmail.ixkey.info> <2f91285f0712301503wa216cc9o18bc45ea7dd04a48@mail.gmail.com> <4778550C.9080506@lojban.org> <925d17560712310351q7f088eb8pefa493a860ef54b6@mail.gmail.com> <477936E6.90709@lojban.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 100 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Dec 31, 2007 3:37 PM, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > > Jorge Llambías wrote: > > On Dec 30, 2007 11:33 PM, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > > > >>Lojban does have a human bias in that we have remna, and we do not have > >>a word for any specific type of non-human intelligence. > > > > What about {cevni} and {crida}? > > There is no particular requirement that either cevni or crida be > intelligent (or have personalities). Is there such a requirement for remna? mu'o mi'e xorxes