From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Apr 01 00:45:36 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JgbBY-0002KJ-Al for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:45:36 -0700 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.231]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JgbBR-00024v-LD for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:45:36 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so2158267wxd.25 for ; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:45:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=KhlOuxP39Ge1naca+mEnK/bDLmpdhC+P/8vpZVPyDBg=; b=EClv/lcJK503OyUUdPAZK2/lpp3r3sdZPQXGiEY8yFtfqwlzTInEls5TMV7s9PAAmv3eqmSsoHveR1rA+GUPgABat3S0s7nU7PiPj0SDVcgbnbr5uZWJ65RfX7fNZSUmmk2kHslStxTSsgW/ctXghtsdBVHiPYQgEJ3kbXAIvp0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QSPuIMNWGNRcllZaPswPpDpi8r7oemPpHfVmaFusQ9vRQ6RXAo29Za+3V7nJzwONDPfhfkpsA5DiB9fjuyJ3EDP4kfNnjZROctiFFwF5gm0E6bf62QsQKT1Cmg3fpKD+3XwQrmChw9yB7GXas1lTMoNTlCQ62mAmOsJmrUYDsis= Received: by 10.114.197.1 with SMTP id u1mr11825765waf.61.1207035925272; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.136.19 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2f91285f0804010045l54aa4d21q5c56697fafc458e2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 09:45:25 +0200 From: "Vid Sintef" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: zo bo In-Reply-To: <925d17560803311701n7fe0ef4bgd5585529580cfc82@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <2f91285f0803310712u446302b6j9a3b70fe3f68091c@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560803311120m7b5175b7l6207e3cb495adca5@mail.gmail.com> <2f91285f0803311148p417ecf63k11d54ffc589b18c@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560803311201x1190fa3j788d108a5c8e16bb@mail.gmail.com> <2f91285f0803311529w7550b697r3e98191ad129377c@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560803311701n7fe0ef4bgd5585529580cfc82@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 415 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: picos.picos@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Jorge Llambías wrote: > In {gi'e -tense- bo} the tense acts as a connective > between two bridi Does that mean that such a tense has no internal sumti like the one in {pu [sumti] ku mi nelci do}? > the function of {nau} as > connective is not specified. Since {nau} is always an absolute "reference point", does it not clearly tell an absolute perspective of the tenses of the connected bridi? mi'e vid