From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Apr 01 10:39:31 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:39:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JgkSJ-00044w-Po for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:39:31 -0700 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JgkS8-00044N-9N for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:39:31 -0700 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so2075033fga.0 for ; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:39:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=RYz84l0bSqXyZ6P62a/no9sUWEtSPTbK7/lezJ1FjsQ=; b=FSw/hqqI/gGjPFoSQrk5d+9GZ2/0O3PNYytXfKdb93wVLdiKUYkaD+2tGnNsGqBQYFAhLvhDZ45bNxV4mF3f6ijt7Q4npXwDQY4FaWLRte48BhYVIo8VJnsy3jIRakfdkx2DePe1jSW8NsqGukMRfYalFzmbfU0aEkUYe8OKYuw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=e0wXefHTpKn5q5OSIGWk4rbuanJ8AEYfBGmUHvFFAK/2qYoAiNnRfIx0wIw+LsmwZmhiexXbt6BkWPklNZN0xlyEBLk2bmvj41J6WZwR/EmaU4MT1tg+mIJl/JsPG1TpPa9D7IC6npO46aKygHj2yFs0a6ssfw0MSX0MztJLcrM= Received: by 10.82.154.5 with SMTP id b5mr19793804bue.10.1207071556545; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:39:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.33.18 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:39:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560804011039u2fa105f5w663c344e35e58b26@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:39:16 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: zo bo In-Reply-To: <2f91285f0804011027x57cd21b8o765094103d8fd34b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2f91285f0803310712u446302b6j9a3b70fe3f68091c@mail.gmail.com> <2f91285f0803311529w7550b697r3e98191ad129377c@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560803311701n7fe0ef4bgd5585529580cfc82@mail.gmail.com> <2f91285f0804010045l54aa4d21q5c56697fafc458e2@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560804010602u2dd4a6bek5876e5f6808c3310@mail.gmail.com> <2f91285f0804010710x33ec6a3ak5218856e8ba9bad1@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560804010732s789875cob48694bd7f4b8e0f@mail.gmail.com> <2f91285f0804010829x792696efrb909039ab4e476a3@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560804010848o1805477mffd4263d23bde906@mail.gmail.com> <2f91285f0804011027x57cd21b8o765094103d8fd34b@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 427 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 4/1/08, Vid Sintef wrote: > > Must {nau} and PU in {gi'e -tense- bo} always behave as a connective? Yes, the whole construct up to the {bo} constitutes the connective. > In {mi do pu nelci gi'e nau bo prami}, why is {nau} seen as a > connective while the two bridi are already logically connected by > {gi'e}? It's the extended connective {gi'e nau bo} that connects the two bridi-tails, not just {gi'e}. mu'o mi'e xorxes