From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Apr 01 14:00:09 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:00:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JgnaT-0005dY-CX for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:00:09 -0700 Received: from imo-m12.mx.aol.com ([64.12.143.100] helo=imo-m12.mail.aol.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JgnaI-0005bT-Fp for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:00:09 -0700 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-m12.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.3.) id d.d45.264f88da (48552) for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 16:59:39 -0400 (EDT) From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:00:08 EDT Subject: [lojban-beginners] kabri .i botpi To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_d45.264f88da.3523fc58_boundary" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.7 X-Spam-Score-Int: 7 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 431 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners --part1_d45.264f88da.3523fc58_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 4/1/2008 05:01:28 AM Central Daylight Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > glass and decanter: {kabri .i botpi}, unless you want to be more specific. > Shouldn't ".i" be changed to ".e" or some other conjunction? I though ".i" was to join sentences into longer discourses/utterances. stevo --part1_d45.264f88da.3523fc58_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 4/1/2008 05:01:28 AM Cent= ral Daylight Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


glass and decanter: {kabri=20= .i botpi}, unless you want to be more specific.


Shouldn't ".i" be changed to ".e" or some other conjunction?
I though ".i" was to join sentences into longer discourses/utterances.

stevo --part1_d45.264f88da.3523fc58_boundary--