From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Feb 17 04:50:55 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:50:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LZPPb-0004R0-9A for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:50:55 -0800 Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.147]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LZPPX-0004QV-Bt for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:50:55 -0800 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 14so619586qwa.58 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:50:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SV9aQExQdjtnKGjE0XRl4Fn32ku1wDV8uQH7vZAWoN8=; b=BU2btafGlCLfNoE/SPNiiF99ZLgQTq3O7Wif/WuC1Z4X+O08C8PsqBXH+KPOdcRhKL cuS8d1sTGKMzzfsilANh2C2Z/B9qm+JwL8VpXS+g1b34DbfXQUBKkAdG4QWaCa1qIajL G1AApqiNHxvC6fRwRToiyRNGeROsb45SAYPag= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=plDxHTURGhFK3gWivXzHASLI39XLq+ow7UpYoFaMwrLK+wjwac3hVrrdmZ+DF8ryFi zQkzI2Zq8t8I0YLZ+hL7/ts9L7/8h+8nWEghHzaAisiOteTNu/F+Ycw0um9nMSJ/bzid /pHlC6oUzcvk2Wmi0TJEp4M6nHLcFADfPGaTU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.97.202 with SMTP id m10mr1756930qcn.77.1234875050042; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:50:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4de8c3930902170423rbddfa99n3c134fbe037e23dc@mail.gmail.com> References: <4de8c3930902170303w5b159a8bi63a914bd907354df@mail.gmail.com> <4de8c3930902170423rbddfa99n3c134fbe037e23dc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:50:50 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17560902170450k1c2cf422w53d80b1a1aac4518@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: ro in detri, numbers in ko'vowels From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 1342 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:23 AM, tijlan wrote: > 2009/2/17 Roman Salmin : > >> Can I (and is it better) to intepret "ro ko'a" not as "all ko'a" but as >> "repeat current bridi for every ko'a" - like cycle in programming language? > > I think you can, and that's how I would interpret it too. But it seems > there isn't total agreement among Lojbanists on this. Yes, "each ko'a" is right, that's what the quantifier "for all" means in logic. I don't think there is disagreement about that one. mu'o mi'e xorxes