From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Apr 10 14:50:32 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:50:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LsOcJ-0003U7-MZ for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:50:32 -0700 Received: from mx.freeshell.org ([192.94.73.19] helo=sdf.lonestar.org ident=root) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LsOcH-0003TY-7F for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:50:31 -0700 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:jwodder@iceland.freeshell.org [192.94.73.5]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3ALo5Ct022764 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:50:06 GMT Received: (from jwodder@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.3/8.12.8/Submit) id n3ALo5PG013685 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:50:05 GMT Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:50:05 +0000 From: Minimiscience To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: lujvo into fu'ivla Message-ID: <20090410215004.GA12830@sdf.lonestar.org> References: <4de8c3930904101055m53888421l643e2e9e268898b3@mail.gmail.com> <200904101740.01504.phma@phma.optus.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200904101740.01504.phma@phma.optus.nu> Organization: SDF Public Access UNIX System User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: de'i li 10 pi'e 04 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. Pierre Abbat .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra. > I suggest "atrilma'e" instead. "trilma'e" is a slinku'i, so "atrilma'e" is > valid. .skamyxatra Actually, I'm pretty sure that's not valid. "tr" is a valid initial consonant pair, and it is already followed by more than one syllable, so the "a" won't be counted as part of the word. At least, I'm pretty sure that's how it works. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [scorX-archive-position: 1495 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: minimiscience@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners de'i li 10 pi'e 04 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. Pierre Abbat .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra. > I suggest "atrilma'e" instead. "trilma'e" is a slinku'i, so "atrilma'e" is > valid. .skamyxatra Actually, I'm pretty sure that's not valid. "tr" is a valid initial consonant pair, and it is already followed by more than one syllable, so the "a" won't be counted as part of the word. At least, I'm pretty sure that's how it works. mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun. -- ne'i le vo'a zdani be bu'u la rliex. la noi morsi .ktulxus. senva denpa