From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Apr 11 06:56:50 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:56:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LsdhS-0001Zf-1u for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:56:50 -0700 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.247]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LsdhO-0001Z7-Dq for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:56:49 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d14so1298229and.1 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:56:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2ON+hstvK2grvqBzIk6jqbu76P3IPq3rfcgQBLDs0cg=; b=FLjjdMAl4M6V2db4lZEbtST0/ZI2M8iVlwp0KEFXpNMYJttt7LI1cbcjuetKTlJ3K+ BaDi3/XtHOjNvedpWxlAC5Il1UDE2DmalSgYcE7K9yZtcAyRecxr6pQez252as3dewIE +53o2oyTIllMCkYiBMqiVCedAnG/D7euc91MA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=c5wKptnZoifrm52TS36cuUUfkpOlg4wBWssUZN4atwcSn9a2h+Itjy9xLBmxG050ze T2JyNHJqitJvGWZ5/oNw8bSH+Q8FulYZmc2wOH3YgaARQ5nuFPA3H0rbj0pzXOtgzu2j k8XiZgdiTS/SI8kpEngtvsjzw8JYUiN6/LPZ4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.140.15 with SMTP id n15mr4176474and.83.1239458204357; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:56:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4de8c3930904110609y5fba16bfm60010d735c32d277@mail.gmail.com> References: <4de8c3930904110609y5fba16bfm60010d735c32d277@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:56:44 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17560904110656o5307a090y9f0dc613bfdea083@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: sei & to From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 4/11/09, tijlan wrote: > Can "to li'o toi" be part of (within) "sei li'o se'u"? That is: "sei > li'o to li'o toi se'u". The grammar of SEI phrases is: SEI [terms [CU]] selbri /SEhU/ [...] Content analysis details: (-1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-archive-position: 1502 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 4/11/09, tijlan wrote: > Can "to li'o toi" be part of (within) "sei li'o se'u"? That is: "sei > li'o to li'o toi se'u". The grammar of SEI phrases is: SEI [terms [CU]] selbri /SEhU/ The selbri is not optional, there has to be a selbri within "sei ... [se'u]" "to li'o toi" is grammatical, any valid text can go within "to ... toi", including the null text, and it can go almost anywhere, so for example "sei cusku to li'o toi se'u" is grammatical. mu'o mi'e xorxes