From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Apr 13 06:48:42 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:48:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LtMWg-0002u4-Kd for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:48:42 -0700 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.123]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LtMWc-0002tH-Dc for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:48:42 -0700 Received: from chausie ([71.75.215.96]) by cdptpa-omta02.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090413134829.QFNA5844.cdptpa-omta02.mail.rr.com@chausie> for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:48:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B51363F3 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:48:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: brivla JOI brivla Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:48:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <4de8c3930904130423v1b670ed0i1bf4dec843947b7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4de8c3930904130423v1b670ed0i1bf4dec843947b7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904130948.25862.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Monday 13 April 2009 07:23:41 tijlan wrote: > Do these make sense: > > .i blanu ce crino > > .i blanu fa'u crino > > At least for the latter I might think of "lo tsani fa'u lo tumla cu > blanu fa'u crino". [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-archive-position: 1514 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Monday 13 April 2009 07:23:41 tijlan wrote: > Do these make sense: > > .i blanu ce crino > > .i blanu fa'u crino > > At least for the latter I might think of "lo tsani fa'u lo tumla cu > blanu fa'u crino". "blace'ori'o" may be useful for the grue paradox. "blanu ce crino" describes a set containing both blue and green things, so one could say "le'i bidju cu blanu ce crino". "fa'u" generally doesn't make sense except with another "fa'u". Pierre