From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Apr 17 14:21:11 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LuvUl-0007vf-0B for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:21:11 -0700 Received: from baal.anno.name ([92.51.131.125] helo=mail.anno.name) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LuvUi-0007vP-GP for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:21:10 -0700 Received: from [192.168.178.36] (p579C2227.dip.t-dialin.net [87.156.34.39]) by mail.anno.name (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6CF06180AC00A for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:21:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <49E8F2FB.2080602@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:22:03 +0200 From: Timo Paulssen User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: du & mintu References: <4de8c3930904170755t415ec77byc42e8417e7764b3f@mail.gmail.com> <4de8c3930904171149r2605f6d1y8030807c705b4570@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9300904171210i49d03792ta0cf8df85507c4a9@mail.gmail.com> <200904171520.30798.phma@phma.optus.nu> <925d17560904171231n6f93a608vf7869d1aa5483aae@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9300904171357q73cd885bl5a3e40d04c523277@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5715b9300904171357q73cd885bl5a3e40d04c523277@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2D3FECCDC399CAAE73DC3FDF" X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Luke Bergen wrote: > 2009/4/17 Jorge Llambías > >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: >>> la tcan. dunli la .en. le ka jgina .i la tcan. na du la .en .i xu la >> tcan. >>> mintu la .en? >> .i la'a la .tcan. la .en. cu ja'a mintu su'o da gi'e ku'i na mintu ro de >> >> mu'o mi'e xorxes > > "probably chan and en are indeed the same by standard at least one something > and however not the same as everything". > > I'm confused with your bridi. Where am I mis-translating? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ----X-archive-position: 1549 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2D3FECCDC399CAAE73DC3FDF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Luke Bergen wrote: > 2009/4/17 Jorge Llamb=EDas > >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Pierre Abbat wro= te: >>> la tcan. dunli la .en. le ka jgina .i la tcan. na du la .en .i xu la >> tcan. >>> mintu la .en? >> .i la'a la .tcan. la .en. cu ja'a mintu su'o da gi'e ku'i na mintu ro = de >> >> mu'o mi'e xorxes > > "probably chan and en are indeed the same by standard at least one some= thing > and however not the same as everything". >=20 > I'm confused with your bridi. Where am I mis-translating? I believe he meant to say {fi ro de} or {zo'e ro de}. mu'o mi'e timos --------------enig2D3FECCDC399CAAE73DC3FDF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkno8v0ACgkQus6NTCHpCEBqwgCfa/D4HwjLZ7Enzkemq8fowC7j lDkAn10ObPRi5Q/QCIS2MUTfdIKuDdkj =tNR8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2D3FECCDC399CAAE73DC3FDF--