From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Apr 17 14:31:38 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:31:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Luver-00012Z-Uj for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:31:37 -0700 Received: from baal.anno.name ([92.51.131.125] helo=mail.anno.name) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Luvep-00012G-E1 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:31:37 -0700 Received: from [192.168.178.36] (p579C2227.dip.t-dialin.net [87.156.34.39]) by mail.anno.name (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BB0F8180AC00A for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:31:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <49E8F571.9020008@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:32:33 +0200 From: Timo Paulssen User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: du & mintu - correction References: <4de8c3930904170755t415ec77byc42e8417e7764b3f@mail.gmail.com> <4de8c3930904171149r2605f6d1y8030807c705b4570@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9300904171210i49d03792ta0cf8df85507c4a9@mail.gmail.com> <200904171520.30798.phma@phma.optus.nu> <925d17560904171231n6f93a608vf7869d1aa5483aae@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9300904171357q73cd885bl5a3e40d04c523277@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5715b9300904171357q73cd885bl5a3e40d04c523277@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2A44E64A1636B1272354D3D9" X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > .i la'a la .tcan. la .en. cu ja'a mintu su'o da gi'e ku'i na mintu ro de Actually, the x2 of mintu in the second part of the gi'e clause is filled by {la en}, which comes before the first bridi-tail, so that the {ro de} does fall into the x3 spot already without fi or zo'e! [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-archive-position: 1551 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2A44E64A1636B1272354D3D9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > .i la'a la .tcan. la .en. cu ja'a mintu su'o da gi'e ku'i na mintu ro d= e Actually, the x2 of mintu in the second part of the gi'e clause is filled= by {la en}, which comes before the first bridi-tail, so that the {ro de} does fa= ll into the x3 spot already without fi or zo'e! Before doubting xorxes ka jbopre, you should *always* think at least twic= e! mi xenru doi xorxes i do prije fi mi gi'e cevni mi mu'o mi'e timos --------------enig2A44E64A1636B1272354D3D9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkno9XEACgkQus6NTCHpCECEzgCgi4okdASFPLhkr1pcPzBlyBtm dsgAniUXsUZHKMTq+w3SH0Dxvoupao4X =/6ds -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2A44E64A1636B1272354D3D9--