From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu May 07 07:06:53 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 07 May 2009 07:06:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M24FR-0006dc-25 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 07 May 2009 07:06:53 -0700 Received: from mail-qy0-f108.google.com ([209.85.221.108]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M24FO-0006cK-3S for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 07 May 2009 07:06:52 -0700 Received: by qyk6 with SMTP id 6so1961979qyk.28 for ; Thu, 07 May 2009 07:06:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WkRa/Ap8sMyaHcrMhTfmKwtsSDRh1w3QraBOOqx0PDE=; b=gQ53YC/py7ayi4NmE9CqWZclBVBDtLOxGoq8eQpdE7j5W2b8SQ1+tusKOIRiEql0Th 2p73pHTRw0DP03ZLnX9PalAHbcMfu/dOkgcIqRtpFIunQLkPNt4j6abXWRVVwy/qmvS+ 9zsW2wNINgN3DUDYL1bznWQRmIb2eAD8an50U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=UkIE+4jamvhQzjxrYzMiCpFjcxGMmqW1zEo5apT+n9ngEKBeSP+W52WxmhIYoWSzYv aHshuLxvpVKH/YPJpgIu4FflE4zU62HNyW+n92Rbo83GOenp05SLbu8nWeSlBPjr//pq KYh/bVhvCki8DSxvdrgKH7xNZIZ/3i+2X2VLg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.72.205 with SMTP id n13mr5269355vcj.115.1241705202680; Thu, 07 May 2009 07:06:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A02E739.2090709@perpetuum-immobile.de> References: <5715b9300905070640n3b1d5fb4ib6f5024cb08850d3@mail.gmail.com> <4A02E739.2090709@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 10:06:42 -0400 Message-ID: <5715b9300905070706t4d0e4379vc984a47afbb42681@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: me imperative? From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b909885839d046953056a X-archive-position: 1632 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners --0016363b909885839d046953056a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I see, so in effect, "let's go" would have to be "doi ma'a ko klama". Is there a more idiomatic/succinct way of doing this? - Luke Bergen On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Timo Paulssen < timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote: > Luke Bergen wrote: > > So if "ko" is used as a "you imperative" is there a way to say "I" or > "we" > > imperative? > > yes, address yourself/selves with doi mi and then use ko. > > mu'o mi'e timos > > --0016363b909885839d046953056a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I see, so in effect, "let's go" would have to be "doi ma= 'a ko klama".=A0 Is there a more idiomatic/succinct way of doing t= his?

- Luke Bergen


On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Timo Pau= lssen <timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote:
Luke Bergen wrote:
> So if "ko" is used as a "you imperative" is there = a way to say "I" or "we"
> imperative?

yes, address yourself/selves with doi mi and then use ko.

mu'o mi'e timos


--0016363b909885839d046953056a--