From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu May 07 07:27:26 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 07 May 2009 07:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M24ZH-0004Uk-8e for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 07 May 2009 07:27:23 -0700 Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com ([216.239.58.187]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M24ZB-0004Qc-VB for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 07 May 2009 07:27:22 -0700 Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so131138gve.36 for ; Thu, 07 May 2009 07:27:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=doDiwtKJ6h+fW5zSIcwX7oYfhVdih+eMs46be2KzzTA=; b=a5PhfxLW2sQVsKCbaAOWxlA1mX0t1qqmjBcG1bhRdCgTbnQ3ypR0LUBBzssti6kgqw KTjyIRHJ5J7Lbzw/HE932WyXmPC01q2ctOnNQ3UgDNSfG2VdAytxHeIZEVP5/Nzk4Zph gnBytX5AuPOgpqH8Wlfv0sNrkXMNEq7m0J7Dw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=oAWHwxXDqrTS7yrstMPZIdBJb3AlydVrvTO56DvtW+b6Z6O7zvhtCf5ZY5qxlDSeEY 5cUgJkbQKZCBgsAeXqUuCIm5Ar+djcfa4gX3F1zsL/u85lcezUdkVZe8h1DnRhINwEeq mBNxO8Z1t8aex+DAsOIAsk5gTP/XrGmi9Fd9E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.73.134 with SMTP id q6mr5523699vcj.51.1241706435061; Thu, 07 May 2009 07:27:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A02ECCE.4050304@perpetuum-immobile.de> References: <5715b9300905070640n3b1d5fb4ib6f5024cb08850d3@mail.gmail.com> <4A02E739.2090709@perpetuum-immobile.de> <5715b9300905070706t4d0e4379vc984a47afbb42681@mail.gmail.com> <4A02ECCE.4050304@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 10:27:14 -0400 Message-ID: <5715b9300905070727t3365b014ga01dd0dbdf6e41f9@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: me imperative? From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b7c70fa28890469534ecd X-archive-position: 1634 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners --0016363b7c70fa28890469534ecd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ahh, I see, I hadn't thought about using attitudinals. Maybe even "ma'a e' u.ai klama"? - Luke Bergen On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Timo Paulssen < timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote: > Luke Bergen wrote: > > I see, so in effect, "let's go" would have to be "doi ma'a ko klama". Is > > there a more idiomatic/succinct way of doing this? > > ma'a e'o (or e'u) klama > > mu'o mi'e timos > > --0016363b7c70fa28890469534ecd Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ahh, I see, I hadn't thought about using attitudinals.=A0 Maybe even &q= uot;ma'a e'u.ai klama"?

- Luke Bergen


On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Timo Pa= ulssen <timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote:
Luke Bergen wrote:
> I see, so in effect, "let's go" would have to be "d= oi ma'a ko klama". =A0Is
> there a more idiomatic/succinct way of doing this?

ma'a e'o (or e'u) klama

mu'o mi'e timos


--0016363b7c70fa28890469534ecd--