From jjllambias@gmail.com Fri Dec 11 04:53:53 2009
Received: from mail-yw0-f178.google.com ([209.85.211.178])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jjllambias@gmail.com>)
	id 1NJ50G-0007qA-V7
	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:53:52 -0800
Received: by ywh8 with SMTP id 8so848165ywh.3
        for <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:53:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=caFO2Ob3nJsg5J+giHI/AYQ8j/xrnejHhzDytnlJOWk=;
        b=psFEv0mDeYNo8L1WqFSNTzqxb5LjJlkmgvvc5K2oZtEehb18YB/KcEOPHIJwuqvZ0a
         Pg12ilfJIiMRWFFVHEYJgY51Om+xEYvCNkZIlf7Bcb6FG/ihICm5RRoa6/dftrdf4Pwn
         plOKAMaAeROEGFKnvIZT0k52c9Ty2JVX+6Ls0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=FnjkcBz/6X8Y7crH1R+dVRoWq0NXY4TVdri3Zj1VZzgg/N7Cc99uM90WNG3j8mb4g+
         xz49hpcRwhwVcBbwrdpS+MkXQbcKz3Am5mqYdcka3VZJHgaGqU8nEZMZwoCmQrdnDdFh
         KhUVgsaURjrNJMagQBVTJb6oUUbQrOpURXP8M=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.91.42.35 with SMTP id u35mr1517514agj.106.1260536020743; Fri, 
	11 Dec 2009 04:53:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <200912110056.32121.phma@phma.optus.nu>
References: <429fde40912101249s24079419g2804c566b311b2a2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200912101715.05760.phma@phma.optus.nu>
	 <925d17560912101728q10ed995fg2202bfc242e14b0c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200912110056.32121.phma@phma.optus.nu>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:53:40 -0300
Message-ID: <925d17560912110453q3780eddcmee16886b229603a0@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: On units and mekso
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> On Thursday 10 December 2009 20:28:26 Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote:
>> If "li" and "mo'e" are converse converters, I guess they must be.
>
> Actually, just based on the spelling, it looks like "mo'e" is the opposit=
e
> of "me'o".

But then shouldn't mo'e only take a text, say a "zo ..." or "lu ...
li'u" sumti, not any sumti?

mu'o mi'e xorxes