From rbysamppi@gmail.com Mon Dec 14 17:16:25 2009 Received: from mail-yw0-f187.google.com ([209.85.211.187]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NKM1V-00089N-9m for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:16:25 -0800 Received: by ywh17 with SMTP id 17so4070114ywh.2 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:16:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Vvvu/a/PP8WnqUNU+Jf/CEc+lN8ymmfI2iUt1kr8mX0=; b=PkqxHARecbsmvzkWbtWfBekAAyAUTbEb2ATvNUOZYc1dKabkMjJerINzbP6n4P+4wa WgPYBqfeHBk1/T2iCBp5ltAg3JL+E0PiJV4aR0IRGhXdvBt+hUokJlWr5oJ8lAlNlJQ0 D/+4z1NDQjtuR0AVk2DXHwNFNZtV/6Plfm6BY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=j6trggkFHL1rMgZgiZi4nEP1FsivMZAeF61L04lTxrsPTWNo3WvQofSAfvBlOELEyI z80sD+2vqNZE6IcgDlO+05ANAV19u7235zaxM0xKKUTaYlYwtQhOp6G+9XGuwPtKfJAe kW9H4Vj81QQg8f+PRA+V/Y3UABeUN4cCD3de8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: rbysamppi@gmail.com Received: by 10.90.41.31 with SMTP id o31mr5614991ago.80.1260839773619; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:16:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:16:09 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: b41caf7c3aa27dce Message-ID: <429fde40912141716h2ebb6d8cy928a4cc2eed97235@mail.gmail.com> Subject: xorlo, lo'e, and le'e From: Joshua Choi To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I tried searching the mailing lists to see if it was answered, but while I found the same question asked by Squark Rabinovich earlier this year, I didn't find an answer for it: Under the xorlo reform, the articles in the LA and LE selma'o are reformed. However, two articles in LE are not mentioned at all in either the informal or formal proposals of xorlo: lo'e and le'e. What is the status of these cmavo after xorlo? Are they deprecated? Or are they included in xorlo? Or are they unchanged?