From pascal.akihiko@gmail.com Sun Feb 21 09:32:41 2010 Received: from mail-fx0-f217.google.com ([209.85.220.217]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NjFfO-0007Vr-KX for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:32:40 -0800 Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so1790679fxm.4 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:32:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jqn2uCH/XyooZnHr2Z3DPScJG8bLO/kGlvWDx8Ho9nc=; b=mokGaDGc3YU9RAABU9VgI6HqtnfuqkkRwnoAbLEfHXVqsWvGuaP2HQZmRoHmsOFg9w 4k+W9oK0RtB4VC65xuYxVoZ0Zcb1acjV9gIZ5r4cPTqDLjmZV5qPtD1ypJFb1fpg4/RM 2ao5N/ruyczCiFjYL5X+9TZmCcVWLGy8ockN0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=B/2RpmsHXL7s5Lnrc2XLLjvFaOiiAd0zbxDbh9kmcH7zRIwCXHrsU+7O9DXUb89H9w +LvP+XBO7PH8WtlzqrlehV+MnHnjumGuoPktA4LNpK+fOOCDP8cJGkedFoeVm3r4yL7O vVyXthkA9t6jvhedocuDl/5t8TOcN/PK8qlow= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: pascal.akihiko@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.14.15 with SMTP id e15mr2624824faa.57.1266773540255; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:32:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <925d17561002210723u262f29fbr5d8822790468e0d4@mail.gmail.com> References: <4de8c3931002210415t4bcca4c1kd75de109836f051c@mail.gmail.com> <925d17561002210723u262f29fbr5d8822790468e0d4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:32:20 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 196dfea695547ce9 Message-ID: <4de8c3931002210932o6bb0e5ecg9433836baf7955bf@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: MEX remainder From: tijlan To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/2/21 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas : > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:15 AM, tijlan wrote: >> How does one express a division remainder in MEX? (CLL seems to have >> no example of it.) >> >> 30 =C3=B7 7 =3D 4 ... 2 >> li cino fe'i ze du li vo ___ > > Remainder is not really an operator. 22 =C3=B7 5 is also "4 with remainde= r > 2", but 30 =C3=B7 7 and 22 =C3=B7 5 are not equal, so you can't really us= e "du" > there. > > You could use "na'u dilcu": > > li na'u dilcu cino boi ze boi re du li vo > li na'u dilcu rere boi mu boi re du li vo > > Equivalent to: > > li vo dilcu li cino li ze li re > li vo dilcu li rere li mu li re ua u'aro'e ki'esai I have another relevant question. Is the following translations of Esperanto correct? dudek du super kvin rere fi'u mu kvinono de tio fi'u mu ti dudek du da kvinono de tio rere fi'u mu ti