From adamgarrigus@gmail.com Wed Mar 17 15:25:53 2010 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ns1gS-0007hd-P7 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:25:53 -0700 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so39030fgg.10 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:25:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=2f9uOd/XoWYB209RC1mKz3xZMBRB5Kz6kNOk++6q2hU=; b=twE33s7nhA9o3gQBhS6N7aJBUtTHZVS9s1/kE2qu/ggbMsgnxVT2IAW2BVtqZOaB/6 v+xB1CsMXq3qYGnOJ+MuG3Zc37+rj+VzTd8XDbzB25t1pWIUPYxZtL/65wOkZzAQHmey c+TOEdZw6RUVTcWc0yrbmbxv/IOo4zYv/zOJ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=dFdpP6jvgsK/P9UlWvjDEfv442xKcF/y8jni72mu5YBtL/TlEI6JID6v/RTjM9emAf gh0O+sEwImBahCjuqGFevwzSYvI9P6v6yYmtCKn+EdCx/jfVb89CxhDGZCerluDwxbbF zveck0TJkG9KCAe1ZecNIG4YwaqPWUtEQorUQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adamgarrigus@gmail.com Received: by 10.239.135.131 with SMTP id d3mr1233287hbd.212.1268864747024; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:25:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <12d58c161003171525x4b62f03m8eaf0e81e30675fc@mail.gmail.com> References: <4BA14159.6020608@perpetuum-immobile.de> <12d58c161003171525x4b62f03m8eaf0e81e30675fc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:25:46 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0af88124f5a22060 Message-ID: <12d58c161003171525v3acabd3fqeed41dab38fac0b7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: coi? From: "komfo,amonan" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f450c083b0ce04820698ab --001485f450c083b0ce04820698ab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:25 PM, komfo,amonan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Geoffrey Stewart < > geoffstewart56@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Timo Paulssen < >> timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote: >> >>> Geoffrey Stewart wrote: >>> > Hello, is this the Lojban beginner's mailing list? (otherwise I'm going >>> to >>> > look like a fool...) >>> Yes, you really are right here. >> >> >>> > Assuming it is, coi! I've been learning the language for a few months >>> now >>> > and thought I'd say hello. >>> Aaw, it's a pity you're so late to the party :) >>> >>> fi'i djefris, Welcome to the mailing list! You should also consider >>> stopping by >>> the IRC channel some day, too. It's all good fun there :) >>> > >>> > mu'omi'e djefris. >>> > >>> >>> mu'o mi'e timos >>> >> >> Great, good to see I'm in the right place. >> >> .i mi'e djefris. .i mi kadnu gi'e se bangu le glico .e le fraso .e le >> latmo to so'u toi .e le lojbo to ji'a so'u toi >> >> I hope my sentences were constructed properly. By the way, why is it >> kadno, and not something closer like kando or knado? >> > > coi fi'i > > *{kando} would conflict with {kandi}; their 4-letter & 5-letter rafsi would > be the same. *{knado} includes a forbidden initial consonant pair. (*Complete > Lojban Language* 3:7) > > mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan > Er, "their 4-letter rafsi would be the same". --001485f450c083b0ce04820698ab Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:25 PM, komfo,amonan <komfoamonan@gm= ail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17= , 2010 at 6:13 PM, Geoffrey Stewart <geoffstewart56@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:


On Wed, Mar 17, 201= 0 at 4:53 PM, Timo Paulssen <timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de= > wrote:
Geoffrey Stewart wrote:
> Hello, is this the Lojban beginner's mailing list? (otherwise I= 9;m going to
> look like a fool...)
Yes, you really are right here.=C2=A0

> Assuming it is, coi! I've been learning the language for a few mon= ths now
> and thought I'd say hello.
Aaw, it's a pity you're so late to the party :)

fi'i djefris, Welcome to the mailing list! You should also consider sto= pping by
the IRC channel some day, too. It's all good fun there :)
>
> mu'omi'e djefris.
>

mu'o mi'e timos

Great, good to= see I'm in the right place.

.i mi'e djefris. .i mi kadnu gi= 'e se bangu le glico .e le fraso .e le latmo to so'u toi .e le lojb= o to ji'a so'u toi

I hope my sentences were constructed properly. By the way, why is it ka= dno, and not something closer like kando or knado?

coi fi'i

*{kando} would conflict with {= kandi}; their 4-letter & 5-letter rafsi would be the same. *{knado} inc= ludes a forbidden initial consonant pair. (Complete Lojban Language = 3:7)

mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan

Er,= "their 4-letter rafsi would be the same".=C2=A0
=
--001485f450c083b0ce04820698ab--