From geoffstewart56@gmail.com Wed Mar 17 20:54:13 2010 Received: from mail-qy0-f202.google.com ([209.85.221.202]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ns6o9-0005Sy-Oa for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:54:13 -0700 Received: by qyk40 with SMTP id 40so1288104qyk.23 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:53:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EXvWP3Wjr5EjkINJfCeapZS6bZphlea4SznNLT+2OOk=; b=Wh6ldpcL93XmNFscxdrsJG5MyugJ/uLm5LAtNaO+QpS7FHzgoSCdWyBul6bAQFDMvr TGRxKuvU9a1kLNnA7lRkM0juY0y9HVigDZulORjUliiHjbj5ORsAuom4Nxlbxq54X2du XHCdHTtopax/ridbvPwQAGhBntb/YeTQgUmjE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=iOrs+m1JzwAOE5AKaSdUEtyzqeZfBGgwUXzJOsnw8nqi9SUtxhS9a31GWclA74BWKs rMN5pkRDTRRJZ6dnH+TQ/oAPojCv4+nX+Ro+pozmE9rVonOnxPxegncKy+RifimN7MPi KUA6HexwQ410NGQAyspZ/IPY9857JPrJGAlMM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.35.3 with SMTP id n3mr580242qad.169.1268884439403; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:53:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201003172233.24542.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <4BA14159.6020608@perpetuum-immobile.de> <201003172233.24542.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:53:59 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: coi? From: Geoffrey Stewart To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f9c9c8a458f2104820b2e05 --00c09f9c9c8a458f2104820b2e05 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Wednesday 17 March 2010 18:13:56 Geoffrey Stewart wrote: > > .i mi'e djefris. .i mi kadnu gi'e se bangu le glico .e le fraso .e le > latmo > > to so'u toi .e le lojbo to ji'a so'u toi > > > > I hope my sentences were constructed properly. By the way, why is it > kadno, > > and not something closer like kando or knado? > > fi'i do mi se bangu lo glico .e lo fraso .e lo spano .e piso'i lo dotco .e > piso'i lo rusko .e piso'o lo xelso .e piso'u lo xebro > > "mi se bangu so'u latmo" means "I speak a few Latins". "mi se bangu piso'u > latmo" means "I speak a little Latin". > > Pierre > -- > li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du > li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci > > > > .e'o I wasn't sure exactly how to say it so I put the {so'u} within the {to} and {toi} parentheses. mu'o mi'e djefris --00c09f9c9c8a458f2104820b2e05 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Pierre Abbat <= span dir=3D"ltr"><phma@phma.optus.= nu> wrote:
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 18:13:56 Geoffrey Stewart wrot= e:
> .i mi'e djefris. .i mi kadnu gi'e se bangu le glico .e l= e fraso .e le latmo
> to so'u toi .e le lojbo to ji'a so'= u toi
>
> I hope my sentences were constructed properly. By the way, why= is it kadno,
> and not something closer like kando or knado?

=
fi'i do mi se bangu lo glico .e lo fraso .e lo spano .e piso'= i lo dotco .e
piso'i lo rusko .e piso'o lo xelso .e piso'u lo xebro

&q= uot;mi se bangu so'u latmo" means "I speak a few Latins"= . "mi se bangu piso'u
latmo" means "I speak a little = Latin".

Pierre
--
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci b= i'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u c= i




=A0
.e'o=A0 I wasn't sure exactly how to say it so I put the {so&#= 39;u} within the {to} and {toi} parentheses.
=A0
mu'o mi'e djefris
--00c09f9c9c8a458f2104820b2e05--