From geoffstewart56@gmail.com Thu Mar 18 14:13:49 2010 Received: from mail-qy0-f183.google.com ([209.85.221.183]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NsN2E-000863-FD for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:13:48 -0700 Received: by qyk13 with SMTP id 13so1313465qyk.29 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:13:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qZq5uF7V5LiSAZsRUFHIQkHl/dHmczEIVDS38yASjDw=; b=BRE/hf9Bm/WIQkk8UHQvjlEKkeGajg1XyoO+JHJynQblv3MZhgITfdbVtbTJBFP/Gc mhG24juOHnivixuSz/TiPfdgPn9aAco8dCz8wWEde19yJ+50gp9msSXLPG9QbFVQZajB m6agauTR1HQReyI/6071Y9mooxsCp3GXu3fGg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QKAzdX/3pkm8sibPIN8Xlt6FgblPeIH1U6DXwx0BBxiQZcGdodEzbPFRHWkXNyhE0n p9dlWWwHKlkha9Zq9uBFlpc6yZwLHKBG5jankzZJoeOFOWEQgr+zhylWn4pu0/K1Ey9g U9Oh2ULFNZr6Faa4z8PPE7Kmi2JnWUAuv0T3s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.63.214 with SMTP id c22mr576581qai.22.1268946813527; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:13:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <324690.70151.qm@web88003.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <4BA14159.6020608@perpetuum-immobile.de> <96f789a61003180559wdfdfff2s474fcb3b1a5d174@mail.gmail.com> <54934.97768.qm@web88004.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <324690.70151.qm@web88003.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:13:33 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: coi? From: Geoffrey Stewart To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6496c920f272a048219b4e8 --0016e6496c920f272a048219b4e8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:57 PM, A. PIEKARSKI wrote: > > > Geoffrey, > > You'll find an explanation as to why Canada isn't {kando} here: > > http://nuzban.wiw.org/archive/9110/msg00119.html > > totus > > > I didn't say {kando}... at least not just now. I said {kanko}, based of the slang term Canuck. It was already explained to me why {kando} was impossible. Anyway it's probably impossible to change it now at all, so this is just idle speculation. djefris. > > > > .i mi'e djefris. .i mi kadnu gi'e se bangu le > > glico .e le fraso .e le latmo > > to so'u toi .e le lojbo to ji'a so'u > > toi > > > > fi'i djefris. do pamoi lo'i kadno jbopre poi se > > sanji mi .i doi > drata jbopre do'u da xu drata kadno jbopre > > (Welcome, > > Geoffrey. You are first Canadian lojbanist that I'm aware > of. > > Hey, other lojbanists -- are there any other Candian lojbanists?) > > > You're not alone, Geoffrey. I live in Toronto. Welcome! >> >> totus >> >> >> >> Thank you! Nice to meet a fellow Canuck. > (Hmmm... if the fu'ivla for Canadian was based on Canuck it could have been > kanko instead, which doesn't seem to break any rules... just idle > speculation, of course.) > > --0016e6496c920f272a048219b4e8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:57 PM, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
I didn't say {kando}... at least not just now. I said {kanko}, bas= ed of the slang term Canuck. It was already explained to me why {kando} was= impossible. Anyway it's probably impossible to change it now at all, s= o this is just idle speculation.
=A0
djefris.
=A0
>
> .i mi'e djefris. .i mi kadnu gi'e se bangu le
= > glico .e le fraso .e le latmo
> to so'u toi .e le lojbo to j= i'a so'u
> toi
>

=A0 fi'i djefris.=A0 do pam= oi lo'i kadno jbopre poi se
> sanji mi .i doi
drata jbopre do'u da xu drata kadno jbopre
<= br>(Welcome,
> Geoffrey.=A0 You are first Canadian lojbanist that I&#= 39;m aware
of.=A0
> Hey, other lojbanists -- are there any other C= andian lojbanists?)
=A0
You're not alone, Geoffrey.= =A0 I live in Toronto.=A0 Welcome!

totus



Thank you! Nice to meet a fellow Canuck.
(Hmmm... if the fu'ivla for Canadian was based on Canuck it could = have been kanko instead, which doesn't seem to break any rules... just = idle speculation, of course.)

--0016e6496c920f272a048219b4e8--