From jjllambias@gmail.com Sun Mar 21 07:13:10 2010
Received: from mail-bw0-f222.google.com ([209.85.218.222])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jjllambias@gmail.com>)
	id 1NtLth-0001Ys-MA
	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:13:07 -0700
Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so4270703bwz.5
        for <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=m4/WJB9hlm24dt3Boig5wJhY9/oGNtEcPFnLSQDc4E0=;
        b=HMpJ7Z6jKQa6uICSTCLFpO4lt2CsCmKOWQul1OyiaYxDap27v74EKWWXGy4O4ChRei
         dk3FyTNj6mu4Wey7VAiNKBA61mixx0P8RT/RZgT/P+yk1XLgVYCDV8/920woVGMPxtgR
         rBGV3exfLx9Zh0ncCO8JOo0rmMAQJgP5eRwos=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=CbS1yL+xbA5SPwsFWRnwUoapEwHoqmasLwvpQPmexWpSjd8q8izwT8T5m1z/aYHJIC
         y4rDGwxatB57kMl2HHCJxtDaDlJQnZueZglPWltT4qttAQ29yY1y6UUamF5leuApUroz
         iuYmpwzPXOaw/w+d1vkjfA8hRPTLABUIySUqw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.143.82 with SMTP id t18mr2402959bku.146.1269180771164; 
	Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5715b9301003210025q7f680f5eo50b3e7d76c38f116@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5715b9301003210025q7f680f5eo50b3e7d76c38f116@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:12:51 -0300
Message-ID: <925d17561003210712r4b4a02f7l1531cf6997f361c7@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] .imu'ibo
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been perusing the CLL looking for an answer but haven't found a very
> clear one so I'll ask here. =A0Does {broda .imu'ibo brode} mean "broda
> therefore (motivationally) brode" or "broda because of (motivationally)
> brode"?

The latter. It is roughly equivalent to "broda mu'i lo nu brode".

> Same question for PU.

For PU it's the other way around. "broda .ibabo brode" roughly means
"brode ba lo nu broda".

>=A0Basically this use of {bo} confuses me in
> just about every way.

That's understandable, because the conventions for tags are not as
consistent as they should have been.

mu'o mi'e xorxes