From jjllambias@gmail.com Tue Mar 23 14:29:02 2010 Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NuBeh-000458-V8 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:29:02 -0700 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so5630370bwz.26 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:28:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EF/qpAU2gyrV8J4RhBWl3YvNTDgIS820IpzmtaWY9Bs=; b=hnkr2z1neqjpx3BYMATTTETS0Az+/F1jYn6tu7EiSxQ5TkFbQY4Xfnd/e3wYPqvLlY HXNubLIkkzWUoSQJWl+Ko2DH154vAXVtZL4PDQUYdq1T6oPd+Fkbs9ImxTHN4Kma5e7S ShQr9h9v8DwWbAogI2tnnrGIn0YXbG1Yo1jmc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CqiDin3XFcQY4ppDDE7h9IP24CBvXnMvLpY10hP2L3f8Ta/OZTiTpKkkLZ3mAVcxyM Nb8kbrSp3hH1g7SvzPkASU/qk8onywA4nIYjew6Io/r7OLZdE7ZfnZDFnzM0F7Q0gijr hXh1hYhiduYWDv5Wy2aNYstneqhPau9FDIi2E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.9.21 with SMTP id j21mr635547bkj.180.1269379726744; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:28:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <96f789a61003231413t2117aa25sc34d6d12a20f6e3b@mail.gmail.com> References: <586963.6470.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <925d17561003231405x13cc5c30j38c738d432488a02@mail.gmail.com> <96f789a61003231413t2117aa25sc34d6d12a20f6e3b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:28:46 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17561003231428r4cda577ew34ec8a8b05be753d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: How verstaile is "nu" From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > 2010/3/23 Jorge Llamb=EDas : >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:39 PM, A. PIEKARSKI wrote: >>> >>> {.i lu mi'o ca simda'a seisa'a la mamcribe ku cusku lojei mi'o cu simda= 'a}. >>> >>> I'm not arguing against the use of {lo du'u xukau} in general=A0but thi= s seems >>> to be a case of where {lo jei} provides the 'neatest' solution. >> >> I don't see the problem in using "lo du'u xukau" there. >> > doi xorxes xu do da'asnu lo nu da'asnu lo du'u da'asnu .i na go'i .i la mamcribe joi da cu go'i .i mi joi la totus cu da'asnu lo du'u xukau sarcu fa lo nu pilno zo jei lo nu da'arsi'u lo du'u xukau da'arsi'u > .i .oi lo besna be mi cu cortu .u'u zo'o mu'o mi'e xorxes