From jjllambias@gmail.com Sun Mar 07 08:24:31 2010 Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NoJHH-0005kC-BL for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 08:24:31 -0800 Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so3745174bwz.4 for ; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 08:24:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TfZGw6wi+C8FY5e9KhOwP6OkrgnFDE/PzWEhllEHhns=; b=e4+tMsZEwEtMI+qSeOBG/xCJwNzy3YPbKeh/x7ZjiHXMT7fdYXuhCGFqkMuAs+SEcH HNCx+KerbaDiiqemiDgl0Ukq6wHA3chmBG0W1nZHyt51OhSRcU3KrgR/kJp9mSPBnRCQ bFsqtDVeoXl9Rl5bUzBi70m3Y+4R8E/CjWV5U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=pU5WZIy4wyHFVkEDgDKNqILe9TPrGWZLFXwjRTp5EOfin98Kow0jtTA/Mhj9FwnB8C 9wSB+wZhld+kNv/Gn2oCK5skF6LLiUJfM/DHkbxXKXvjmSIABsLt+T5p95xp8sIL3M4H LxwbSE3e4lbuh6WE10tOSEp8qrsgkPPqFntlg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.131.210 with SMTP id y18mr3465142bks.100.1267979060850; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 08:24:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4de8c3931003070812s660499afl15c1a96936184da6@mail.gmail.com> References: <925d17561003060810n97fe8d2g4ecbf679e3592cc4@mail.gmail.com> <925d17561003061124m3b04332fqfe9b5e258fb0dff@mail.gmail.com> <925d17561003070619l4e855e76jc714fab2668536fd@mail.gmail.com> <4de8c3931003070812s660499afl15c1a96936184da6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 13:24:20 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17561003070824s39dd4b70h521bbee5b1dee7e4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: la blupinxe nunjamna From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:12 PM, tijlan wrote: > > But "lo ka ze'e kukte" does not specifically state that what is tasty > is the vamp, even though the comparison is made of "do" (the vamp) to > "lo cevni", right? The x1 of this "kukte" could be "lo ciblu be ce'u", > which wouldn't be metonymy. Right, when "ce'u" is not explicit, it could in principle be anything. The normal interpretation is that "ce'u" goes in the first unfilled argument place, but that can be overridden by context. mu'o mi'e xorxes