From lojban-beginners+bncCJ2UzZHuDRCJi6jeBBoEWiJ7Qw@googlegroups.com Sat Apr 17 12:01:51 2010 Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O3DGw-00044K-Ly; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:01:51 -0700 Received: by gyd5 with SMTP id 5sf2527272gyd.16 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:01:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RtNFUWMp7Q31Fxa+XNfL6pCeZqHLTC7mYOmxMgWo2CI=; b=6ISkyEgMPm7bVL6vJq2hrqKoNyh/XkhJpbmuekq3ZgYppuO5e2NfADnIsZR9n7xzwE xhiCQxsogFq+zXMmZl41sQGNUSCVv+5JaMnOoZ39rjvi07T1MR5vPcdN46upBvNW7y+M HREUmjA6T96se5YpZqPzAQROS0eyiw2Eg9/lY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kFOcJ89YS8WwIew5+gNEJ4gYzrcvUlq5eyeeFJNJqGOFXjD2RhM1/mKCc1eua9M+rj IHNskRrm+yFAT+sklLNN+hrNpHviBDv0rAhfVOMbM99UWL2OsgKsaGXKDtNPJwXbJgKX E2pYukLqsLpxwRhAjs++eExVwLSF6VuXE0Mak= Received: by 10.91.49.16 with SMTP id b16mr886656agk.38.1271530889609; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:01:29 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.24.105 with SMTP id w83ls900959wew.1.p; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:01:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.88.211 with SMTP id a61mr291394wef.24.1271530887587; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.88.211 with SMTP id a61mr291393wef.24.1271530887540; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f191.google.com (mail-qy0-f191.google.com [209.85.221.191]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id h17si4936805wbh.1.2010.04.17.12.01.26; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.191 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.221.191; Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so3978894qyk.2 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:01:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.79.75 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:01:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <09da87a4-5d57-45d1-8de6-489ad02aea24@z7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> References: <09da87a4-5d57-45d1-8de6-489ad02aea24@z7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:01:25 -0300 Received: by 10.229.97.207 with SMTP id m15mr1715369qcn.6.1271530885618; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] About {mi cu facki di'e} From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.191 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:39 PM, symuyn wrote: > Question. Is it a misuse of using {di'e} to say {mi cu facki di'e .i > mi nelci lonu citka}? Assuming that the speaker is saying that she > discovered that she likes eating, rather than discovering the text "mi > nelci lonu citka". > > I'm finding a lot of instances on the group mailing list where people > use {di'e} in this way. But it doesn't seem right=85shouldn't it be > {la'e di'e} instead? Yes, "la'e di'e" is the correct way to say it. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.