From lojban-beginners+bncCMHEmaCOBhCF8KfkBBoES9GO9Q@googlegroups.com Fri Sep 10 02:19:34 2010 Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Otzla-0006DE-Vp; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:19:34 -0700 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15sf462625wwe.16 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:19:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=188Bh8NPi/9HC1pqsFGZ2J1BTE1mgnul9jdtXSX9x/E=; b=ZMro21Ge3TgqJUW+0IoN/8kCkSL7GVSkTmhohDbyyvuWnzhetZGK/kAAzgAuiDXT2H 0LPByrylOhDNYTNuM/OSC9C42qRN7EMFsaPFbv9SrksvMKaAa9i6EJVw9OMWwgS6t/sP EbHAzgGa2GAyO45KwiMG/WFkmWdJr9pSdwA+w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=r53g1PA2c96SXHZlMD9MJeMIqhWFvWIdsNfz7ghQHAtrbLYzeEcudWl9X5TLWJ3FOx LX8a9pvUF+l9eJQlVs6T2lmIo+Cg4k01p4bAmTzzs+kTccl0lAsLSqq8KbyAqcFFtoEd xisFRsBeFTWYdDnP79jx7FZW+vKp9YcWWrT0I= Received: by 10.216.145.167 with SMTP id p39mr51253wej.25.1284110341387; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:19:01 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.139.159 with SMTP id e31ls2798825wbu.0.p; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.207.209 with SMTP id fz17mr32316wbb.27.1284110340069; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.207.209 with SMTP id fz17mr32315wbb.27.1284110340009; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f180.google.com (mail-wy0-f180.google.com [74.125.82.180]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id k12si795251weq.11.2010.09.10.02.18.58; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:18:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.180; Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so2487429wyb.25 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:18:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.134.69 with SMTP id i5mr708939wbt.165.1284110338323; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.22.199 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:18:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C89F785.4060902@gmail.com> References: <4C88FE19.3010505@gmail.com> <4C891A69.1070507@gmail.com> <4C89F785.4060902@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:18:57 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] lo la me no da From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65a0182917479048fe43c15 --0016e65a0182917479048fe43c15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:16 AM, wrote: > > "lo ka du no da" works. Also "lo la me no da", or "lo ka no mei". >> >> mu'o mi'e xorxes >> > "lo la me no da" doesn't parse in the official parser, nor in jboski. > (jbofi'e, camxes and lojgloss I can't get to work. what do you use?) > Is this expression valid then? Can someone explain? > > loka > > typo: {lo ka me no da} -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --0016e65a0182917479048fe43c15 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:16 AM, <lokanoda@gmail.com> wrote:

"lo ka du no da" works. Also "lo la me no da", or "= ;lo ka no mei".

mu'o mi'e xorxes
"lo la me no da" doesn't parse in the official parser, nor in= jboski.
(jbofi'e, camxes and lojgloss I can't get to work. what do you use?= )
Is this expression valid then? Can someone explain?

loka

typo: {lo ka me no da}

-= -
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bend= e pe denpa bu

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--0016e65a0182917479048fe43c15--