From lojban-beginners+bncCNTPpI2KGxDD97brBBoExp2xEQ@googlegroups.com Tue Mar 01 19:39:00 2011 Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Puctt-0006Pc-Dh; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:39:00 -0800 Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1sf3512141vws.16 for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:38:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis :x-cloudmark-score:x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:x-google-group-id:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; bh=YNxIfGamJXrkxW4fHg8R07ewDNkUlLbIQAk3Ma3baDM=; b=jiYaNJSwedUiUCGeCkJAdpxkVT+PD1l+dyoTqBcxKcUdiRnAbTppt+Y+fAvloxnPGg TsnaQKIMIwgoQ7KbP7SoLyO4IHmsoseeHXaQfB/5vR7IqrEuEfugR5Iz/teBjGKBI+78 kGrY7V0msecvp2afAsqziC0VN3f9JIKOJzU38= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:x-google-group-id:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; b=i/v/UQvc8OyOrULp1u1vNluHXi831TIUqwhuK6vnVWAFOh2B6bxBXp3o9ceL7ljpkN 8RvPdZGPdNcdJB36MAzsz7ZnN9QDSZKoVepgs10SEzKHo/VwTJXeCjHXQgZBTIyhAL7B DJHKxJwQ5Ia2OSVTAPsKNrn9qE6A+aWXd+Hzs= Received: by 10.220.200.5 with SMTP id eu5mr783677vcb.9.1299037123385; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:38:43 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.89.83 with SMTP id d19ls2768214vcm.5.p; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:38:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.179.99 with SMTP id df3mr278896vdc.25.1299037122392; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:38:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.179.99 with SMTP id df3mr278895vdc.25.1299037122379; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:38:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.121]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id cc8si329530vdb.3.2011.03.01.19.38.41; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:38:41 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.121 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.180.132.121; X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=tLsyj04/L/SH/N6p42ldY6jXDYWe4pX5hAm6uRA1LKo= c=1 sm=0 a=j85lRnVo4UUA:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=g4JHii8c-V_PhDaq6uAA:9 a=mxlrujrt13rAC9Jwl6HHn7fxFzkA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:58621] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 58/7A-05134-0CBBD6D4; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 03:38:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED65433A for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 22:38:40 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] More than five places? Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 22:38:37 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201103012238.38772.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.121 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu X-Google-Group-Id: 94518172 Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 01 March 2011 16:30:03 Jonathan Jones wrote: > I didn't know about the SExiPA method. It's interesting, but I think I'll > stick with FAxiPA on the rare occasions when it matters. :) > > What about {fai}? Is it applicable in these situations? No, {fai} is meaningful only when {jai} is also present. Pierre -- The Black Garden on the Mountain is not on the Black Mountain. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.