From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jan 10 06:47:44 2007
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-es); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:47:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1H4ejr-0006Pb-9X
	for lojban-es-real@lojban.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:47:40 -0800
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.189])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <jjllambias@gmail.com>)
	id 1H4eji-0006PR-MC
	for lojban-es@lojban.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:47:38 -0800
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so874627nfb
        for <lojban-es@lojban.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:47:28 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=JlaLuYCZFyvX9DiMW4h4mp0oIbB5OkNxh2W/QYa/iveAFqXAMBBLLBj2OK8buhkmDeiw0abl1J4pFtGdOK55GbQZsVssV47BQS7k/WhFCt4RhWWopehcsxmHVWCSGSmHjIjso/CLhO7OWlBTOiNYqO70i2K7/Xx/GKkCg9P7xTE=
Received: by 10.49.94.18 with SMTP id w18mr1217314nfl.1168440445569;
        Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:47:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.9.12 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:47:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <925d17560701100647s488eab24nc53a203b3fefa862@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:47:25 -0300
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-es@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-es] Re: le si'o pemci mo
In-Reply-To: <7d6acd5e0701091421v22b84b00xab9f6fdcf392cf96@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <7d6acd5e0701091421v22b84b00xab9f6fdcf392cf96@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -1.6
X-Spam-Score-Int: -15
X-Spam-Bar: -
X-archive-position: 182
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-es-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-es-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-es@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-es

On 1/9/07, karxdu@gmail.com <karxdu@gmail.com> wrote:
> le si'o pemci mo i do cuscu di'u ca viska
> le mi kanla sepi'o le do blanu kanla kei
> i le si'o pemci mo i xu do te preti fo mi
> i le si'o pemci me do
>
> xu le prosa drani ri'anai ti na rimni
> i xu zo si'o drani

  le si'o pemci cu mo
  =BFQu=E9 es la poes=EDa?

{cu} es necesario para separar el selbri, de lo contrario {pemci mo}
forma un tanru.

  do cusku di'u ca lo nu viska le mi kanla sepi'o le do blanu kanla
  T=FA dices eso viendo mis ojos con tus ojos azules.

{ca lo nu ...}, porque {ca} se usa aqu=ED para agregar un sumti.
=BFTal vez {catlu}, "mirar", es preferible a {viska}, "ver"?

  le si'o pemci cu me do
  La poes=EDa eres t=FA.

{cu} es necesario para separar el selbri.

  xu le prosa cu drani ri'anai lo nu ti na rimni
  =BFEl texto es correcto a pesar de que esto no rima?

{cu} y {lo nu} necesarios por las mismas razones de antes.

En vez de {ti}, se podr=EDa usar {ri} para referirse a {le prosa}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes