Received: from mail-gw0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]:62098) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R6U4g-0004sk-TD; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:11:29 -0700 Received: by gwj23 with SMTP id 23sf2350560gwj.16 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:11:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition; bh=4JG6Ux0/6gRDtuBUEpGeFuYuMntbuGlv2JRu0/k1EgQ=; b=kH1FxWSvjj/lKyE6DchGn4znh2PN6bOmIT5+h8weAVMJR02bfD+R6ORtF4v7DoBkzZ hXbTCPqJrts7BfqUIpBiA2RXyun1jcgz+jNk9S+EZTrpnWeIE+NyEDngQMAvaFVcJbAr u5kTsb9eH3uXSuLz+uZoyYiTQcz9HAjp+WXvM= Received: by 10.150.116.21 with SMTP id o21mr342929ybc.71.1316639475018; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:11:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.100.209.1 with SMTP id h1ls6433279ang.4.gmail; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.181.132 with SMTP id l4mr7907801yhm.7.1316639474246; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.181.132 with SMTP id l4mr7907799yhm.7.1316639474235; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b5si2939447ybf.0.2011.09.21.14.11.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.213.54 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) client-ip=209.85.213.54; Received: by ywp17 with SMTP id 17so2382093ywp.27 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.131.42 with SMTP id l30mr2801945yhi.30.1316639473871; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:11:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sunflowerriver.org (c-76-113-7-111.hsd1.nm.comcast.net. [76.113.7.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i28sm24487242anm.11.2011.09.21.14.11.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:11:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:10:46 -0601 From: ".alyn.post." To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Should we have another mailing list for abstruse discussions? Message-ID: <20110921211110.GE29295@sunflowerriver.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <90e6ba6e8ea2b4b5d104ad5c4012@google.com> <201109210015.38262.phma@phma.optus.nu> <1f80cb56-ee89-400c-ab47-26cd672ee572@l4g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.213.54 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) smtp.mail=alanpost@sunflowerriver.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam_score: 2.1 X-Spam_score_int: 21 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 02:49:27PM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote: > Okay, pros and cons for moving such discussions to their own list (feel > free to add your own): > > Pros: > People who aren't interested in the discussions won't see them, because > they won't be subscribed to that list. > Newbies won't be discouraged from learning Lojban due to seeing long, > technical, abstruse discussions. > > Cons: > People who are interested in the discussions will need to subscribe to a > new list, and post those kind of topics exclusively on that list. > [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.4 BUG6152_INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD BUG6152_INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD 0.6 INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD Invalid Date: header (timezone does not exist) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 02:49:27PM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote: > Okay, pros and cons for moving such discussions to their own list (feel > free to add your own): > > Pros: > People who aren't interested in the discussions won't see them, because > they won't be subscribed to that list. > Newbies won't be discouraged from learning Lojban due to seeing long, > technical, abstruse discussions. > > Cons: > People who are interested in the discussions will need to subscribe to a > new list, and post those kind of topics exclusively on that list. > Add to the con: it won't always be clear that a discussion that starts on the main list will turn into a longer conversation that should have been on this proposed list. > Based on just what I have above, we should have a "lojban-theory" list. > I'd make it myslef, but that would mean I'd be subscribed to it, and I'm > one of the uninterested people. > Protip: You have to summarize the thread, not just restate your own pro/con argument in a new format. > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:01 PM, ianek <[1]janek37@gmail.com> wrote: > > Wow. > Pierre started a discussion about how discussions on this list go > long, obscure and lack conclussion. > And guess what? > That discussions momentarily grew long and obscure and I haven't seen > a conclussion. > Wow. > > mu'o mi'e ianek > On Sep 21, 6:15*am, Pierre Abbat <[2]p...@phma.optus.nu> wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 September 2011 18:28:53 Remo Dentato wrote: > > > > > {bu'u pa sasfoi lo bakni ku sisku lo srasu .i lo gerku ku go'i lo > > > ractu .i lo tcikonia ku go'i lo rebyrespa} > > > > I'd say "tupsince", since snakes and lizards are more closely related > to each > > other than to other extant reptiles, and other reptiles have tails. As > to > > tsikonia/tcikonia, I'd call them variants. vlatai rejects "tsiguenia", > but > > that's a bug. > > > > I understood all the Latin except "eodem". Usually I don't understand > enough > > words in a Latin sentence to make sense of it. > > > > Pierre > > -- > > li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du > > li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to [3]lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [4]lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > [5]http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > References > > Visible links > 1. mailto:janek37@gmail.com > 2. mailto:p...@phma.optus.nu > 3. mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com > 4. mailto:lojban%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com > 5. http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en -- .i ma'a lo bradi cu penmi gi'e du -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.