Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]:46694) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R6VNz-0005nf-5q; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:35:29 -0700 Received: by fxg17 with SMTP id 17sf2626290fxg.16 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:35:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=UFqN5M2H8WCpbZIDccCKubPhOIZgiMkO67jU0KOfe78=; b=O8PDH+Ax6dipmB3KRCRhZrmr1QeY1VlSaG02tQrugYzCzuNuCDOc/7LW8iNXpPCU4y SbEgoXxCZoCA/Ar3hQsmrkwT4Y2nntNKf5EWEOaLRr6mniOBv7IhGbFgY5xs2j2sa60T tMct/PNlVZwCUGs/eUb+chp5Jpp5KOI9GcJ2s= Received: by 10.223.17.154 with SMTP id s26mr353727faa.44.1316644498349; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:34:58 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.134.87 with SMTP id i23ls2873112bkt.2.gmail; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.130.69 with SMTP id r5mr331849bks.4.1316644497228; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.130.69 with SMTP id r5mr331848bks.4.1316644497203; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f42.google.com (mail-fx0-f42.google.com [209.85.161.42]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b26si85621fao.0.2011.09.21.15.34.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.42; Received: by mail-fx0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b27so2153464fxb.29 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:34:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.9.69 with SMTP id k5mr1840051fak.62.1316644497074; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.41.68 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:34:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110921211110.GE29295@sunflowerriver.org> References: <90e6ba6e8ea2b4b5d104ad5c4012@google.com> <201109210015.38262.phma@phma.optus.nu> <1f80cb56-ee89-400c-ab47-26cd672ee572@l4g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <20110921211110.GE29295@sunflowerriver.org> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:34:56 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Should we have another mailing list for abstruse discussions? From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce0ed5c8b2b9d04ad7b2fc5 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --000e0ce0ed5c8b2b9d04ad7b2fc5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, .alyn.post. wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 02:49:27PM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > Okay, pros and cons for moving such discussions to their own list > (feel > > free to add your own): > > > > Pros: > > People who aren't interested in the discussions won't see them, > because > > they won't be subscribed to that list. > > Newbies won't be discouraged from learning Lojban due to seeing long, > > technical, abstruse discussions. > > > > Cons: > > People who are interested in the discussions will need to subscribe to > a > > new list, and post those kind of topics exclusively on that list. > > > > Add to the con: it won't always be clear that a discussion that > starts on the main list will turn into a longer conversation that > should have been on this proposed list. > > > Based on just what I have above, we should have a "lojban-theory" > list. > > I'd make it myslef, but that would mean I'd be subscribed to it, and > I'm > > one of the uninterested people. > > > > Protip: You have to summarize the thread, not just restate your own > pro/con argument in a new format. > Protip: I don't have to summarize anything, and that's not a restatement. -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --000e0ce0ed5c8b2b9d04ad7b2fc5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, .alyn.p= ost. <alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 02:49:27PM -0600, Jonathan Jones = wrote:
> =A0 =A0Okay, pros and cons for moving such discussions to their own li= st (feel
> =A0 =A0free to add your own):
>
> =A0 =A0Pros:
> =A0 =A0People who aren't interested in the discussions won't s= ee them, because
> =A0 =A0they won't be subscribed to that list.
> =A0 =A0Newbies won't be discouraged from learning Lojban due to se= eing long,
> =A0 =A0technical, abstruse discussions.
>
> =A0 =A0Cons:
> =A0 =A0People who are interested in the discussions will need to subsc= ribe to a
> =A0 =A0new list, and post those kind of topics exclusively on that lis= t.
>

Add to the con: it won't always be clear that a discussion that starts on the main list will turn into a longer conversation that
should have been on this proposed list.

> =A0 =A0Based on just what I have above, we should have a "lojban-= theory" list.
> =A0 =A0I'd make it myslef, but that would mean I'd be subscrib= ed to it, and I'm
> =A0 =A0one of the uninterested people.
>

Protip: You have to summarize the thread, not just restate your own pro/con argument in a new format.

Protip: I don't have to summarize anything, and = that's not a restatement.

--
mu'o mi'e= .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi= patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--000e0ce0ed5c8b2b9d04ad7b2fc5--